Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Peregrine Diamonds Ltd. PGDIF

"Peregrine Diamonds Ltd is a diamond exploration and development company with interests in diamond exploration properties located at Nunavut and the Northwest Territories in Canada and The Republic of Botswana."

GREY:PGDIF - Post Discussion

Peregrine Diamonds Ltd. > CH-6 Underground expansion potential
View:
Post by Kidlapik on Mar 13, 2017 10:20am

CH-6 Underground expansion potential

The previous estimates for CH-6 from 260m-380m depth called for an estimated tonnage increase of between 2.15 to 3.49-million-tonnes. As the drilling results show the resource is open at depth and the wall angle is roughly a straight shot, 90 degrees, lets double that and we are looking at: 4.3 to 6.98-million-tonnes at 2.45carats per or 10-17MILLION carats. Using the WWW valuation of $188US/carat that is an in situ increase of between $1.98-3.22US-BILLION in just one pipe....
Comment by cudjo on Mar 13, 2017 10:30am
kidlapik, resource is open at depth, to where they have drilled to date, but you’re (only for you slippery) making a HUGE assumption it will continue below as above from 260-380m, mommanature could throw an "actual" curve ball in there, to be adult about it, what is the other scenario if indeed there is a curve ball?  Another year, more financing, to look at CH7 in more detail ...more  
Comment by cudjo on Mar 13, 2017 10:44am
as your assignment today, recommend everybody go look at the 12th slide in the resource presentation and study the diagram and the numbers without the rose colored glasses on, note the quick narrowing of the high grade kim at 260M, so the ONLY tell will be the actual drilling to 500M, do not assume, good luck. see page 12:  https://www.peregrinediamonds.com/assets/docs/technical-update2016 ...more  
Comment by Kidlapik on Mar 13, 2017 11:31am
I appreciate where you are coming from cudjo, it is always good to have a balanced viewpoint. Even the "low grade" kimberlite zone comes in at 2.12cpt so the #'s I used I consider a fair range in which to compare actuals achieved against, hopefully, in a years time.
Comment by Kidlapik on Mar 13, 2017 11:39am
There is a new corporate presentation out on the website that uses slightly different figures. 2.37cpt LOM average with $178US LOM average value.
Comment by ekim on Mar 14, 2017 12:37am
The 2.37 cpt LOM average might be because they left some carats in the ground for the PEA. They would have tried and extracted out all the 4 cpt+ material in the ultimate pit for the PEA. LONG...PGD EKIM
Comment by cudjo on Mar 13, 2017 1:31pm
good point Kidlapik, we will see what the drill brings up, any thoughts on the financing? good luck.
Comment by Kidlapik on Mar 13, 2017 2:05pm
No clue but given managements history I am not prepared to rule out a discounted rights offering. Though they barely managed to raise $7million the last time they did it so I hope they find a better way, but as they say hope is not a strategy.
Comment by mill44 on Mar 13, 2017 2:22pm
Rights are risky for the Friedlands in my opinion. Although I would not mind if someone would get a 5-10% interest in PGD, just to counter their power.
Comment by cudjo on Mar 13, 2017 3:15pm
risky, meaning they would not fill the offering like last time?  The first go around they stated they would fully participate, as well as buy up any rights not exercised, results - packed house, the last one they stated they expected management to fully participate sans the left over like the first, results, not completely filled, short a couple of million bucks.  If they stated ...more  
Comment by mill44 on Mar 13, 2017 3:40pm
No, risky for them, possibly ok for small shareholders. They said that they were in talks with several parties. I assume the talks went nowhere because the price was too high. People keep talking about how Chidliak's numbers are better than anything else around.. With a rights offering at a discount, 15c or under, at least 50M new shares would be issued. How many  shares and rights would ...more  
Comment by cudjo on Mar 13, 2017 3:49pm
agree mil, PP at a premium or at a discount?  Or does it matter?
Comment by mill44 on Mar 13, 2017 3:54pm
Not really. People on the sidelines waiting for cheap shares will drive the price up anyway once they realize that there is a real chance of missing out.
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities