Post by
green24 on Aug 26, 2014 8:27am
Q2
OK, so it would appear that Q2 production jumped about 22% over Q1 production.
Net earnings of 11 cents a share in the first half means earnings in Q2 were also up slightly.
Mighty impressive for a stock that closed at 48 cents.
Comment by
Jefferam1 on Aug 26, 2014 9:50am
What am i missing? at first glance this seems like steal?
Comment by
green24 on Aug 26, 2014 10:05am
Proof? Two excellent quarters, but nobody knows about the company. If they keep raising production and profit the story will get out. Low 0.25 debt to CF. 11 cents in earnings in the first 2 quarters of the year. And currently only bid .475. Enjoy!
Comment by
elgaveeno on Aug 26, 2014 10:58am
2 excellent quarters? Funny. Since the Q2 isn't even out on Sedar yet, I will wait until the real data is out. $16-18/boe net back is about $30 less than industry average. Excellent. Bottom line: missed production target, STILL over promising on Y/E production, taking all the cash and puting it into an exploration well... no corporate governance.
Comment by
mickina on Aug 26, 2014 11:43am
You wine drinker: I guess you were glued to your computer to see the 2nd quarter results so you can make some nasty comments. It must be really imporatant for you to bash QXP despite the fact that you have no investment in it. You must have a lot of extra time to do research on companies you do not invest in. How many other companies you are commenting on what you do not own? 100?
Comment by
green24 on Aug 26, 2014 1:17pm
They are on Sedar now. Quit yer whining and buy while it is still cheap! Or sell and I'll buy more. You complain about the net backs being below the industry average, and completely ignore that 23% of the market cap was just recorded as earnings in the first 2 quarters of the year? 5.5 cents in earnings PER QUARTER on a 48 cent stock isn't enough for you elgaveeno?
Comment by
davpro on Aug 26, 2014 1:35pm
Just an opinion based on a cursory look at the financials... but it does look unusually cheap. Unless there is some great hidden liability of which I'm unaware this should be priced significantly higher.... Bought some today.... seems I paid too much or did I? Anyway if it is what it appears to be I'll likely be buying more.
Comment by
green24 on Aug 26, 2014 3:33pm
Was that because of me davpro? 3-9 days of downtime due to maintenance/inspections in Q2. I don't know if they can achieve their 2500 boe/d 2014 exit rate goal or not. But even at the current 1525 boe/d average for Q2, it looks darn cheap to me. Looks like the market agrees. Up 27% now. I wouldn't be shocked to see it run for a few days.
Comment by
davpro on Aug 26, 2014 4:48pm
Yes it was but if you had timed your post for a little later I could have saved a few hundred. Anyway it looks as though some are seconding my first impression. THANKS
Comment by
mickina on Aug 26, 2014 1:39pm
Algeveeno: Your credibilty is approaching 0 on your frequent bashing comments with admittedly no investment in it. Get a life!
Comment by
Brunswick200 on Aug 26, 2014 3:53pm
"IdrankTheVino" has gone from slamming production to now hanging his hat on corporate governance. What will you be grasping at next "IdrankTheVino" or should I say "IdrankALLtheVino"
Comment by
rknigh2 on Aug 26, 2014 10:06am
It is very cheap. Fairly illiquid and retail driven share price though. Some concern with their ability to replace reserves, but thats the same for most producers. There arent any this cheap with near zero debt and good cash flows. If they do add more liquids production with the drilling program the share price will increase dramatically - i.e. liquid fuel netback increases
Comment by
Ciao on Aug 26, 2014 10:57am
After running up to .57 and sitting at .55, someone dumped 23,500 shares at market to let it drop to .49, thus scaring retail investors and keeping a lid on the stock.