Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Ruby Creek Resources Inc RBYC

Ruby Creek Resources Inc. is engaged in developing a gold property. The Company's project includes the Gold Plateau Project. The Gold Plateau Project consists of property, which has artisanal gold mining activities. The Gold Plateau Project is located in southern Tanzania approximately 150 kilometers north of the Mozambique border. The Gold Plateau Project consists of around 15 properties of... see more

GREY:RBYC - Post Discussion

View:
Post by traveller180 on Feb 27, 2012 2:57pm

lawsuit???

Handeni Gold sues Mkuvia JV partner

2012-02-24 14:17 ET - News Release

by Mike Caswell

Handeni Gold Inc., a Vancouver-based OTC Bulletin Board listing, has filed a lawsuit against its joint venture partner on the Mkuvia gold project in Tanzania, claiming that the partner has defaulted on property payments and owes $1.3-million. The suit seeks an order permitting Handeni to sell the property to third parties, plus payment of the outstanding amount.

The dispute is detailed in a brief notice of claim that Handeni filed in the Supreme Court of British Columbia on Thursday, Feb. 23. It names as a defendant Ruby Creek Resources Inc., a New York-based OTC-BB company that agreed to acquire 70 per cent of the Mkuvia property in November, 2009. The suit complains that Handeni did not receive full consideration for the property interest, which included the $1.3-million as well as four million Ruby Creek shares.

The problems with the agreement, as described in the claim, began on June 1, 2011, when Ruby Creek was to pay $450,000 to Handeni. According to the suit, Handeni did not receive the payment, and still has not received it. A further payment was triggered when Ruby Creek raised $4.6-million in a 50-cent financing that closed on Aug. 23, 2011. Handeni claims that upon closing of the financing Ruby Creek was to pay an additional $917,100. This amount remains outstanding as well, the suit states.

Handeni further complains that it has not received the four million tradable Ruby Creek shares that were to be issued under the agreement. It says that Ruby creek did issue the stock, but has refused to remove a trading restriction.

Handeni says that in the event of non-payment, the agreement entitles it to retain all payments and find another buyer for the property. The suit seeks court-ordered payment of the $1.3-million, an order removing the restrictive legend on the four million shares, plus an order stating that Handeni is entitled to market and sell the property.

Vancouver lawyer David Dahlgren of McMillan LLP filed the suit on the company's behalf. Ruby Creek has not yet filed a response.

Handeni, which recently changed its name from Douglas Lake Minerals Inc., closed Friday at 12 cent

Comment by traveller180 on Feb 27, 2012 3:23pm
IMHO here, but this really is a no brainer. I think that Ruby knew exactly what they were/are doing and agree with Yukon's post on the HNDI board that they were smart to hold off on investing in a property with no clearly defined title of ownership. Time...I have a lot of that. Faith...the company has always proven themselves to me. Money...they have all of that my wife allows me to spend (ha ...more  
Comment by DRRabbit on Feb 28, 2012 10:42am
How do you think this will affect RBYC? Must have an effect of some sort....what would that be? Comments? Suggestions? Ideas?  
Comment by attorney8 on Feb 28, 2012 1:29pm
Little effect, if any, for now, since they are currently have a license and are mining a different parcel- Gold Standard.
Comment by mermoo on Feb 28, 2012 2:28pm
Apparently RBYC had served them 3 weeks prior and were negotiating with them to solve the issues.  Hindeni must have hoped they could offset some of RBYC's claims.  I guess we will see who has the better lawyers.
Comment by stockarchangel on Feb 28, 2012 3:33pm
I've heard that before. I think its in all of our best interests to find out if its true. Why didn't RBYC NR a lawsuit? Why didn't HNDI NR that THEY were being sued? It is a material event and can dramatically affect both companies. Also, what venue was it filed in? It's quite easy to look it up if the suit was filed in the US. I have been PM-ed about this a couple of times, but ...more  
Comment by traveller180 on Feb 29, 2012 3:35pm
Patience, my good sahib. All will work out in the wash...plant (ha-ha).