Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Ruby Creek Resources Inc RBYC

Ruby Creek Resources Inc. is engaged in developing a gold property. The Company's project includes the Gold Plateau Project. The Gold Plateau Project consists of property, which has artisanal gold mining activities. The Gold Plateau Project is located in southern Tanzania approximately 150 kilometers north of the Mozambique border. The Gold Plateau Project consists of around 15 properties of... see more

GREY:RBYC - Post Discussion

Ruby Creek Resources Inc > why reduced volumes
View:
Post by jonggua on Jun 02, 2012 12:11am

why reduced volumes

Johann Coatzee and Rob Slavik believed they could get 200 ton/hr (Ruby was using 2/3 of that for cbm) from the 3 trommels they had bought in Songea and also the one in 2010, so their prior projections came to 133 cbm/hr. This would take them to great eps at .5 g/m3. However, the 3 trommels together are now believed to only produce 40-60 cbm/hr. At .5 g/m3 and $1500 this will NOT make us profitable. At higher prices and 2 shifts a day, 15 net hours of production, 60 cbm/hr can get us to cash flow positive. Also, Rob bought the 2 other trommels in Songea very cheaply, but they were not in place this fall and so we've missed nearly a whole year of production from these other 2. I believe one of them is too small to work on its own, and also their earthmoving equipment is breaking down and not quickly repairable, nor is it enough to feed the trommels adequately. More money is needed for more trommels, and bigger ones, and also for better and more repairable earth moving equipment.
Comment by Public_Heel on Jun 02, 2012 7:13pm
Thanks, jonggua. Given how tiny Ruby is, and given that it's still trying to establish itself as a working entity, this is a screwup of major proportions. Too bad.... and even worse that it's indicative of inexperience and ignorance of this type of operation, which means there's probably similar news coming in the future.
Comment by cadillacsam on Jun 02, 2012 10:40pm
Why hasn't this information been made public weeks or months ago? Is that why the share price has fallen so much?