Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum West Red Lake Gold Mines Inc Com RLGMF

West Red Lake Gold Mines Inc is a mineral exploration company. It is engaged in acquiring, exploring, and developing mineral properties in Red Lake Gold District, Canada. The company involves in mining several gold projects across Canada, which includes West Red Lake Project, Rowan Mine, Mount Jamie Mine, and Red Summit Mine.

EXPM:RLGMF - Post Discussion

West Red Lake Gold Mines Inc Com > HISTORICAL 43 101 - ROWAN +
View:
Post by Wangotango67 on Dec 24, 2021 9:47am

HISTORICAL 43 101 - ROWAN +

Yeah... it's a helluva read - 927 pages.

https://www.geologyontario.mndm.gov.on.ca/mndmfiles/afri/data/imaging/20000014758/2_53517_10_DiamondDrillingReport.pdf

.Lots of other intel to gain a better understanding of what RLG  really has.

Take for instance - beginning at page 53 - outlines gold grams ( to 1 gram )
Yet... there is a significant number of intercepts over 1 gram - why focus on this ?

Anything above the 1 gram is ( in my opinion ) minable. 
RLG - has used a cut off of 3/ g per tonne.

If one factors in all intercepts - 1 gram and above -  the resource size grows exponentially.
in terms of - selling the gold ounces - every 100,000 oz of gold for the purchaser and based on 2200 spot cdn gold - factoring in 1200 cost t omine leaves the purchaser with $1,000/ cdn

Using a cut off of 3 grams might be a tad extreme when every ounce of gold from a 1 gram to 3 grams could be factored in. 

Supposing a purchaser buys each ounce of gold ( wholesale for ) $250
leaves the purchaser with a %750 profit margin.

While on the flip side-  every 100,000 oz of gold for the seller - results in,
$25,000,000 cdn

I haven't has time ot read the full 927 pages - but i will ovder the holidays sift throught it.
Thus far... i have come across some interesting details pertaining to the geology in which the gold is found - appears the geology is - clastic sediment -  now factor in the surrounding lakes - the gut wih raised elevations around the Rowan - i'm thinking replacement depoist - mass water erosion tearing apert the surrounding  risdgelines redepositing the gold into a matrix of clay sediments -  aside of the main vein -  throw in lots of breccia - which mixes in with the clastic's clays - throw in lower elevations in a gut - can't help but think Rowan is a former lake bed that wraps around int othe NT  zones meeting an eastern resistence point - porphry hill which guided the clatic sediments to move southerly - gold settled out in the low lying basin - boomerang pattern -  wrapping southerly - creating the  NT  zone. A theory, yes, just a theory. 
Place a major fault line at  Rowan mine  - thus, two formations of gold occur -  Fault vein - and breccia created by the fault and watershed creating clasitc clays that redepoist the gold along strike ot the east and later, southerly. Hence the cores are laced with - breccia + clays.

my first poke at - Rowan....
As stated, i'll continue this in a few days, after the Holidays....

Clastic Sedimnents are known for - zinc + copper.
But... i need ot read more on the Red  Lake area - aside of the South Bay Mine.
Sadly, most juniors in the Red Lake areas - over the years - never included the copper or zinc values - making it rather hard ot know for certain if other juniors have additional mineral credits to endorse open pitting. 

One last note - on page 27 - one of the holes encountered 25% pyrite.
It's findings such as this thart needs to be more explored.
As most know - gold can harbor in pyrite so can copper and zinc is usally not far away.
25% pyrite with no follow up on the kind if pyrite -  why point this out ?
All because chalocpyrite is found on RLG's claims.

.

Cheers....
Be the first to comment on this post