Ravenquest Biomed Inc RVVQF

RBC Self Directed = Anon

[HowdyBob]

That was a 1st for me. I bought through RBC self direct and the shares traded as Anon seller and Anon buyer; 2 orders 10 minutes on Neo and Chi.

Lots of eyes on this one. Hopefully the sector bottoms with the quarterly reports that came out last week and so a momentum change for the whole sector.

With a sector momentum change and Tax loss ending in a month and the ammendment for the other 5 rooms, maybe we can get a move with some substance.

[ashleigh64]

what time did those trades happen at so we can confirm this for ourselves? - ashleigh

[HEYthereGuYs]

This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy

[HowdyBob]

Why, what does that type of activity mean to you that you want to confirm it? according to https://web.tmxmoney.com/quote.php?qm_symbol=RQB:CNX there were two trades Anon to Anon in the last 20 trades of the day alone so it's not unique.  very weird question but that's normal for you ash. certainly interesting a trading desk for one of the main clearing houses bothered to

[ashleigh64]

you made a claim about 2 specific trades. i see over 20 trades on the alt exchanges today. i asked for the times so i could be certain that i'm looking at the right 2 trades. you see, i like to try to verify what others have claimed. i don't just blindly trust. but i also don't want to look at the wrong info and make bad assumptions. that's why i ask. it's not weird to clarify

[HowdyBob]

it's just awkward, what you write. And yes it is very weird to ask a total stranger about their personal trading activity and if you do not think so then...again...awkward. Also, you can't verify anything since it was Anon to Anon and there were a number of those instances today. Whats to trust? What do you learn when you look at trade data that says Anon to anon? what are you verifying?

[ashleigh64]

you were the one who brought up your own trades here on this public board. i want to confirm that those trades exist in the trade lists that i know of, regardless of the volume. i don't care about how many shares you bought. even the largest trade today was for an inconsequential small amount, regardless of who was involved. some friendly advice. if you consider your trading activity to be

[HowdyBob]

There is no way for me to prove they were my trades, your questioning doesn't make sense and you know it. so you are trying to confirm what can't be confirmed, why? The reason I posted is because clearing houses are using anon on self directed trades, not to share my trades, but you know that already. You seem well connnected enough to know why they did that please share with us blind

[Benz61]

This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy

[CaffeinatedBaco]

Hey Ashleigh, You understand that Howdy could literally point to *any* two anon-to-anon trades and say "Those are the ones". We're all looking at the same data. Without insight into their personal trading account (meaning, you can log in as them at RBC, look at all Howdy's trades, see the lot size, price, and times of those two trades of RQB, and THEN correlate those trades with

[Benz61]

This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy

[ashleigh64]

obviously howdy could be lying about such trades. but i'll also give people the benefit of the doubt. in this case there were 2 specific trades mentioned, among numerous candidates. i wanted to make sure that i was looking at the right 2 trades. there's no reason to get upset over a reasonable attempt to eliminate some ambiguity. - ashleigh

[Benz61]

This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy

[crash01997]

This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy