Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Second Wave Petroleum Inc SCSZF

GREY:SCSZF - Post Discussion

Second Wave Petroleum Inc > PETROAMERICA study case
View:
Post by iaminvestor on Nov 17, 2012 5:07am

PETROAMERICA study case

1)  This new poster "lamwcw"  who showed up from nowhere, has definitely AN  AGENDA. so  BEWARE folks. He may work for Crescent Point or he may work for another suitor/neighbor of SCSZF (PWE, PGH, Coral Hill, APA, DVN)  or he has been fired by SCSZF. Either  way,  BEWARE as his posts are lame, clueless and full of claims and personal unsustainable assumptions.

2)  Check  PTA  case....Petroamerica. PTA  has  also 40-50%  WI  in  Llanos  Basin  of  Colombia. PTA  is  NOT  an  operator  SAME   CASE   like   SCS.  The operator is Parex  and Cepolsa  and few others  for  the wells of Petroamerica in Llanos Basin. Despite the fact that PTA is in EXPLORATION  phase and NOTHING  could  warranty the existence of oil, the oil was found and PTA price has risen significantly lately....300%  and  goes higher.

 

Here with Second Wave, WE DO KNOW THAT THE OIL IS THERE! it is  NOT  like the Colombian Basins.

BHL is a PROVEN HUGE  OIL  POOL  with IP same like PTA in Colombia AND  HIGHER. Read the latest report where Second shows IP of 4,000 and 5,000 BOEPD !

After the recompletions and the establishment of the infrastructure (electrification, pipelines) during the summer, the drilling starts up AGAIN  with Crescent as operator. 

Second has identified  90 LOCATIONS and only 16 have been drilled thus far. The company says it clearly.

 

Second has almost $30M  POSITIVE FFO  annually. Its cost share per well is $2M (40%  WI)  for  Second, so the company can drill minimum  10  NEW   WELLS  within  its  funds from  operations annual budget.

 

 

3)   ADD  the  initiation of the  WATERFLOOD  program that DOUBLES  (minimum) the production. Check  the latest  news   from   Pinecrest,  the   FIRST  VERY   ENCOURAGING  results   from  Arcan Resources,  Crescent,  Legacy.

 

4)    The current EV is less  than  $150M !  $65,000  per  boepd (75%   oil)!

The  company  trades  just    2x   its  FFO   with  Edmonton  at  $85   currently !

Comment by iaminvestor on Nov 30, 2012 12:27pm
   Check  PTA  case....Petroamerica. PTA  has  also 40-50%  WI  in  Llanos  Basin  of  Colombia. PTA  is  NOT  an  operator  SAME   CASE   like   SCS.  The operator is Parex  and Cepolsa  and few others  for  the wells of Petroamerica in Llanos Basin. Despite the ...more  
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities