Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Spyglass Resources Corp SGLRF

Spyglass Resources Corp is an oil and gas exploration and production company that conducts its operations in the Western Canadian Sedimentary Basin. The Company is a dividend paying, intermediate oil & gas company that trades on the TSX under the symbol 'SGL'. It operates oil and natural gas properties in Alberta, Saskatchewan and British Columbia.

GREY:SGLRF - Post Discussion

Spyglass Resources Corp > Problems with logical assertions
View:
Post by Proud_Canadian2 on Jun 06, 2014 12:29pm

Problems with logical assertions

Here [and all too often] elsewhere, the problems are such that any missing element can be [and often is] detrimental to the entire edifice [including the “subterranean vault” as well].

If $1.00 label hung over SGL by TD has any merit [and when any of the “big boys” make statements like this they have the means to drive the stock there], all other supposedly positive elements of discussion [in $$ terms] effectively become null and void.

Are there positives about SGL? Sure, and they are plenty, but when the ability [and puny level of VESTED INTEREST in terms of stock ownership] of the management gets questioned, nothing looks good at all.

If SGL is indeed a candidate to be taken over, for all holders of this stock to be “happy”, per share price must be around $3.25 [this is my opinion given that no "worms in the wood" are hidden of which I don’t know]. If it is so, the sticker price for SGL would be about $720 million, debt included. Considering vast undeveloped land [the unknown in terms of reserve potential] and currently decent level of production, $720.00 million is a very reasonable price to pay. Who can or should pay it? I don’t know, but the problem is that usually no one pays 100% premium for anything [i.e. about double the price where SGL is trading now].

IMO, speculating over potential takeover is detrimental to the moral of management, employees and shareholders alike. Today, more than ever, the onus of responsibility is on management alone. To get ahead, they must: 1. Invest more of their own dough for others to believe them. 2. Double the number of experienced personnel to FOCUS on operational efficiencies to control costs and fire those who miss clearly unnecessary overruns. 3. Take risk to spend on drilling exploratory wells on lands that currently have big fat zero label in terms of what can be booked as reserves of any kind [to do it relatively painlessly, IMO, cutting the dividend [at least] in half may pay off sooner than the prospect of eventually drowning the company in debt that would wipe out almost all value down the road]. Strictly counting on persistently high commodity prices is not enough, if the costs are running out of control and / or nothing is added to the reserves.

This is my humble and totally uninformed opinion. None of the above was intended to dismiss logical assertions of others expressed on this board. One thing, however, is for sure: given that the banks are obviously tightening the noose around the neck of this company, I really don’t like decision-making abilities and / or the level of involvement of management running this pathetic show. They must show hands-on unambiguous leadership, not trickery emphasising the “best value on the block" with prospects to be sold for peanuts just to get their own rather puny initial investment back... With vast lands they now have [and potential reserves below them], prudent stewardship and relatively high commodity prices, SGL can be valued five times higher than it is valued now... or it can be driven into the ground...  

PC2
Comment by Sukhi19 on Jun 06, 2014 1:38pm
When LTS was down Wright was buying and he was being trampled over by everybody. Suddenly he is the best guy in the business. He has been buying SGL heavily. My feeling is that they are very close to selling some of their non-core assets to strighten the balnce sheet and SGL will take off just like LTS. If it goes under $1.70 I will add.
Comment by darkstream on Jun 06, 2014 9:25pm
Wright is the biggest manipulator in the business-he could make a fortune playing poker-be lucky to see $2.25 on any takeout but I would even be happy with that -don't think Wright has a whole lot of SGL but if you know his holdings please post
Comment by BlueCollar51 on Jun 07, 2014 5:31am
Wright, John David Relationship as filed with regulators: 4 Latest filing date: May 23, 2014 Direct Ownership   Common Shares                                              ...more  
Comment by darkstream on Jun 07, 2014 9:19am
thanks for the info -I own 5000 lol
Comment by jelect on Jun 07, 2014 2:06pm
Also George Armoyan an activist investor on the board. as I posted earlier John Wright on BNN remarked that there was a lot of interest in LTS non core assets so maybe a similar situation with SGL.
Comment by Sukhi19 on Jun 08, 2014 12:57am
darkstream, you can check Wright's holding on canadianinsder.com. If you log in, you can check for last six months. I am pasing below the extract (from canadianinder) of his purchases:- As of 11:59pm ET June 6th, 2014   Filing Date Transaction Date Insider Name Securities Nature of transaction # or value ...more