Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Spyglass Resources Corp SGLRF

Spyglass Resources Corp is an oil and gas exploration and production company that conducts its operations in the Western Canadian Sedimentary Basin. The Company is a dividend paying, intermediate oil & gas company that trades on the TSX under the symbol 'SGL'. It operates oil and natural gas properties in Alberta, Saskatchewan and British Columbia.

GREY:SGLRF - Post Discussion

Spyglass Resources Corp > The REAL Issues
View:
Post by BlueCollar51 on Jul 06, 2014 12:23pm

The REAL Issues

  1. Poor operational performance.
  1. It’s clear that there are infrastructure problems at Dixonville. It does appear that Spyglass is working with the regulator to sort them out. This is the Oil and Gas business and “stuff” does happen.
  2. What I find to be more of a concern is that to date Spyglass has consistently not met their guidance re the Capex program. Always one excuse or another (usually the weather). They don’t seem to be capable of planning and executing a Capex program.
 
  1. The sustainability of the current dividend. In my opinion a meaningful reduction in the dividend would be beneficial. It would demonstrate to the market that they are serious about maintaining a 100% or less all in POR and improving the balance sheet.
 
It would give them some room for a poor quarter or two due to a Dixonville type of a problem or weak commodity prices without increasing the debt.
 
In good quarters it would give them the ability to reduce the debt and or increase the Capex.
 
 
As Always; Do Your Own Due Diligence; It’s Your Money !!
 
PS; I have a ½ position in SGY at $1.63
Comment by eusdond on Jul 08, 2014 9:59am
I agree with all your commentswith the exception of the dividend cut___ The one and only way I would agree to a dividend cut would be if Management were to take a salary cut percentage wise as to the percent of the dividend reduction... If the shareholders must take a cut in pay (Dividend reduction) then the Management who caused the need for it, through their extremely poor performance,should be ...more  
Comment by rad10 on Jul 08, 2014 11:54am
Eus - there will be more than a "cut in pay" when they announce the divi reduction. Remember the stockhouse gurus were predicting that a cut was "priced in" at LTS last November?  Expect a drop in the SP similar to back then. That might prove to be a time to consider buying into SGL.  It worked out fairly well @ LTS. When this merger was first proposed there was a ...more  
Comment by eusdond on Jul 08, 2014 2:50pm
Senior management pledged a lot of things at that time that have failed to materialize... They have had more than enough time to turn this ship around and get it headed in the right direction yet we continue to languish...
Comment by jelect on Jul 09, 2014 12:13am
with George Armoyan and John Wright on the board I expected some action. whether people wont or dont wont a dividend cut they seem to be in a precarious position. JMO  GLTA
Comment by shambano1 on Jul 09, 2014 8:48am
things may not be as dire as they appear. firstly, the Noel was very successful and I'm pretty sure they are looking at selling or JV-ing this property, so they will get cash up front.  They ahve 85-90 low risk drilling locations, so they can sell outright or justm sell an interest for a cash injection.  This play has 8-9 years of development in it alone. second- the glauc well is ...more  
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities