Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Sandstorm Metals & Energy Ltd STTYF

GREY:STTYF - Post Discussion

Sandstorm Metals & Energy Ltd > Thanks are in order..
View:
Post by cloudrunner on Feb 16, 2013 2:46am

Thanks are in order..

elmo, zentarian,doomz,thundersole

You guys and your knowledgeable approach and discussion do a lot to help some of us less technical investors understand things that we would never have the capacity to dissect and process.

I for one appreciate you sharing with us and look forward to your comments after the CC this coming week.

Comment by doomz78 on Feb 16, 2013 4:47am
I love digging deeper into things.  And on this board I can think out loud.  Bounce ideas off other like minded people.  I love doing it and no problem.  A reasonable part of my retirement is banking on SND , SAND, SLW, FNV, RGL.  All NSR and streaming companies.  So it's in my best interest to know what I am talking about.  And If I don't know listen to ...more  
Comment by doomz78 on Feb 16, 2013 4:49am
This last post was meant for SAND..  Not SND.  Im losing it.  Too much sreaming on my mind.  I love the buisness model. 
Comment by zentrarianNZ on Feb 16, 2013 7:34am
Total agreement, doomz. Especially your concluding statement re maintaining "our rational and [mostly] geopolitically safe" game plan!...Speaking of probabilities, considering the investor doubts they must have known it would create, I think the probability is HIGH that NW & Co. spent more time and DD vetting this deal than almost any other they've signed. So there is reason to ...more  
Comment by elmothefearless on Feb 16, 2013 12:57pm
Part of me thinks they didn't spend much time vetting this deal, and I mean that without any derision.  I think this is what would have stood out for them:   - Rio Tinto, a world class mining company, is the operator - in two - three years time they plan to process enough ore to earn SND ~$13 million and SSL ~$37 million   I think Nolan looked at that from SND's perspective ...more  
Comment by zentrarianNZ on Feb 17, 2013 12:27am
Elmo...Go take a look at Countrygent's comments on the SSL board (if you haven't already) and I think you will agree that Nolan & Co. must have - or at least should have - spent a great deal of DD time on this deal. I've been persuaded - by you among others - that it was a good decision, if a bit of a toss of the dice. But the issue isn't the potential reward, it's the ...more  
Comment by thasis on Feb 17, 2013 3:51am
Zen.... You hit the nail on the head with your final statement below.  I think management gave fair advance warning of its new direction. Those who are uncomfortable with it should simply look for another place
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities