Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum ARC Resources Ltd T.ARX

Alternate Symbol(s):  AETUF

ARC Resources Ltd. is a Canadian energy company. It is focused on the exploration, development, and production of unconventional natural gas, condensate, natural gas liquids (NGLs), and crude oil in western Canada. Its operations are focused in the Montney region in Alberta and northeast British Columbia. Its operations in Alberta are located near Grande Prairie and the region includes Kakwa... see more

TSX:ARX - Post Discussion

ARC Resources Ltd > ARC should trade 60% higher
View:
Post by MyHoneyPot on Jul 29, 2021 8:10pm

ARC should trade 60% higher

Here are some thoughts, in a comparison with TOU which is their most like company.

Arc produced 335,701 boe a day, while TOU sold 414.387 boe equivalent of energy a day.

Arc value of their boe is 34.90 while TOU value is 24.67

This means that an  ARC boe is worth 41.46% more than an ARC boe.

This means that CF wise.

 Arc = 34.90 * 335,701 *90 = $1,054,436,841  More cash flow for ARC 
TOU= 24.67 * 414387 *90 =    $920,063,456

This means that ARC Produced 15% more Cash Flow than Tourmaline.


Operation Costs

ARC = Op cost 4.53 Trans 4.49  Royalties 3.02  = 22.86    + Hedge Loss = 20.89  50.7% uplift
TOU = Op cost 3.70 Trans 3.99  Royalties 1.51  = 15.47    + Hedge Loss = 13.86
 
So every boe that ARC produces they get 50% more dollars than TOU


This is essentially FFO, Funds From Operations without all the balance sheet stuff, and management compensations and other income sources.

(Hedge Losses Included)
So essentially

ARC FFO  =  22.86 * 335,701  boe * 90day = 690,671,237   33% more FFO than TOU
TOU FFO =  13.86  * 414387   boe * 90day = 516,906,343
 
Comments
  • Tou hedging loss was $1.60 a boe compare to Arc 1.97 a boe
  •  
  • Arc’s costs are higher but they are process 3X the liquids
  • .
  • TOU underspent this quarter in Capex while are has a average capex quarter they outspent TOU by 80 million in the quarter on Capex.
  •  
  • Tourmaline has a market cap of 11 Billion Arc market cap is 6.8 billion, tourmaline is trading at a 62% premium to ARC and I believe ARC out performed it this quarter.
  •  
  • Both have good balance sheet and TOU has off loaded debt in monetization of assets in Topaz and ARC still own all assets and have no royalty overrides. (Kakwa alone has 3 billion worth of infrastructure)
Conclusion

Arx had a great quater and should be trading 60% higher to have the same market evaluation at TOU, but ARC generates more cash flow, more FFO, and is worth a whole lot more money than TOU in my opinion. The are currently producing 33% more FFO than Tourmailine, they spent 80 million more capex this quater. 

If the capex spend was the same ARC and TOU would generate very similar cash flow. TOU report the number a little different than ARC.

ARC should be a 17 dollar stock. 

Up UP and Away

IMHO
Comment by PabloLafortune on Jul 29, 2021 8:57pm
is the Q2 unrealized hedging loss $453M? If so thats $14 a barrel. And if Q3 and Q4 commodity prices are higher, not only is that $453M not coming back but a lot of it becomes realized while more unrealized is added to the kitty.
Comment by sunsurfer11 on Jul 29, 2021 9:09pm
My understanding how it works...they have to mark up or down the npv of the entire hedge to market conditions...so the hedge is now carried at todays prices...if tomorrow price increases..more loss..if tomorrow price goes down..the you have a hedge gain..the entire hedge to the last barrel is shown at market now..no expecting much more loss unless ng goes to $5
Comment by PabloLafortune on Jul 29, 2021 9:26pm
Thank you. Not easy for me to follow but yes it will come out in the wash as part of realized losses later so its double counting of sorts. Btw, Tourmalines unrealized was $164M in Q2. Implies that they have a lot less hedges and will benefit more than ARX in a rising price environment and vice versa. ARC essentially hedges 4x more. Also reviewing the md&a, corp netback for ARX was $17.82 ...more  
Comment by Robertboblaw on Jul 29, 2021 9:35pm
If we are able to pay down a sizeable amount of debt go forward, anyone think tracking 50% of the value of TOU is possible?
Comment by Robertboblaw on Jul 29, 2021 10:00pm
Ignore my post about tracking the value of TOU. Let's just get that debt paid down imo go forward.
Comment by Robertboblaw on Jul 29, 2021 9:18pm
The ceiling on the oil/condy hedges in 2022 improve to almost $60. Im not 100% sure how these types of hedges with floors and ceilings work, but if the true ceiling is $58 with no added "complexities" or whatever that could bring it down, it's not a deal breaker imo. Anyone feel free to comment on next year's hedges if I'm off base. Even if oil prices maintain or go say 10 ...more  
Comment by Robertboblaw on Jul 29, 2021 9:25pm
I'm going to put some work on these hedges next while, to work out how their hedging position might improve/not improve going forward compared to Q2. Also these types of hedges If I'm not mistaken are more complex than traditional hedges so it wouldn't hurt to familiarize myself with them going forward.
Comment by altagold on Jul 29, 2021 9:29pm
ARC SHOULD TRACK TOU,   ARC  SHOULD BE A $20 STOCK IF TOU IS  AT  $30   ARC HAS MORE UPSIDE IN SHARE PRICE UP UP AND AWAY WE GO