Bombardier Inc. T.BBD.A

I Voted. I hope you will.

[BBDB859]

I voted against PB.
"   "          "        all the amendments including Consolidation.

The way I see things is simple.

PB has to go. They all make more money than most people in those posts in the world markets. Whether Management and/or Manufacturing Jobs. The company is cutting back in SG&A and OP expenses. These are not times for raises or more spending. 

On consolidation. I voted NO, because I don't even care, when the price of the Shares will climb to from $1.50 to as people say "no more than $10". Because there are too many outstanding shares out. I would still make more money than going to $20.00 on consolidation, and having the shares climb to $200.00.

I don't forsee the shares of Bombardier ever going to $200 SP anyways. But I can see them hitting $10 dollars SP, without Consolidation, from now to 2026/7. The company should be @ $1.5B FCF, and $1B +FCF, and $3.8B, + or - on LTD by 2025. That to me is a good pace. We've done great FINANCIALLY in one year (2021). Think of how good we'll do 5 or 6 years from now?

[dreamer05]

I agree with you. I am going to vote No. to consolidation and no to the people who  planed to it. I have more than 135K  votes. I plead my fellow shareholders to do the same.

[Luckyeleven]

All sharehoders should exercise their vote no matter how many shares they own. Imo they will have the votes to do whatever the heck they want as well increasing compensation which is sad. It sems always some kind of drama with the bomber which creates uncertainty. Many here saying how well the company is doing but the shareprce and market says different. All markets near all time highs despite the

[gossamer9]

This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy

[Acuras1]

With respect 859, I'm not sure it's easier to raise market cap with a $30 dollar stock than a $3 dollar one with the type of shareholders that buy buy stocks under $5.00. GLTA

[BBDB859]

Hi Acuras. I peronally don't give my heed to Market Cap. I find it useless. Just otstanding shares X SP. It's not indicative of the company's real value either. The bomber SP is so manipulate too, so you can't say that it's SP is accurate. I know it's used for certain Evaluations. But the only thing I'm interested in is good constant Revs, FCF, +FCF, Debt reducts

[clubhouse19]

859.. Market cap is important when it comes to criteria required to list . The share is important to those such as institutions as one of the requirement to invest. It is becoming less and less critical as they continue to deleverage..more important to me is their ability to service the debt and their improvement of FCF.   The present share price is  3 $$ or so above current book

[BBDB859]

Operating CF/share is = $5.29 SP/CF = 2.23 Market Cap/cf = $5.28 Does that tell you that the stock is way undervalued?

[clubhouse19]

859 What is the expected cash flow for the year   Market cap value / cash flow or  2.3 B X  $1.44 / cash flow for 12 months =  ???   value of 10-20 is considered good Is expected cash flow for 2022    50 million $$  if so the ratio is 66...

[Bottoms]

But at $500M CF in 2025, the ratio is only 6.6 I guess that makes for yet another indicator for a 3x in 3 years?

[HopefulJuan]

Blackberry with annual revenue of $185 million market cap is 1.5x BBD with revenue of $6 billion. Share price is 6x. Not logical 

[johnney]

do not forget the $6.7B US od debt and their evaluation CCC+ and drowning outstanding shares!

[Acuras1]

Let me put it to you differently 859: Market cap doesn't mean anything.  My point is ALL that matters is FCF numbers per each share and to make the shares more attractive to all institutional buyers, including foreign pension funds. Your point is well taken that it's easier to bring a stock from $1.50 to say $15 than from than from $15 to $150. But regardless of share price all

[BBDB859]

Ya Acuras, I get your drift. Your saying that if the Bomber increases things like EPS, It'll increase the interest for the shares by Institutions. Therefore better for us shareholders. The point you're making makes sense to meon regards to the shorting. Because when an Institution sees this dilution/RS, for this small increase in EPS it does very little to increase their demand for the

[Acuras1]

The reverse split announcement took most by surprised, especially since considerable progress  has been achieved throughout 2021. The previous announced request for a RS seemed to make  more sense in the crucial transition of the company pre sale of rail and structures and especially so when shares were taken off the TSX. I was actually pleasantly surprised the RS strategy was never

[Acuras1]

Forgot to reply on my comment about market cap. It means nothing and my failure to express myself clearly:) Whether share price is $3 per share or $30 per share upon a 1 for 10 RS, the company's financial metrics per share remain the same. Point was simply to highlight the institutional side has preference for stocks above $5.00 GLTA

[BBDB859]

Sorry Acuras. I was in a hurry when I wrote my earlier post noon today. When I noticed this post by you tonight. I don't know if this was directed towards me though.The only Thing I might add to your post, on Institutional preference for stocks of higher than $5 is. Yes I believe you're correct, they have certain rules, in fact they have to follow them, before they invest in certain

[Acuras1]

I totally agree that should a RS be implemented, the place and timing of the RS must be very carefully chosen. Doing a RS today would bring little benefit, except bring up share price, leaving the company just as vulnarable to shorts.  However, I don't understand "other than dilution". I'm not looking to bust anyone's balls here, rather a little clarification on how

[Shamhorish]

what you say is good yess but imo , consolidation will increase share price + show better earning per share + and with more earning per share management can start to pay dividants all of the above, conso. fcf, higher sh.p,, higher earning per share, deividants will with no doubt bringing many buyers single investores and institutions (long bbd) all of the above will raise bbd to a different and

[bicente]

A while back , when the bomber started talking about shareholder value , the ultimate goal was to bring back the dividend ( even if it minor)  to help the shareholders gain back some lost value .. with a reverse split they can issue a higher dividend per share with the reverse share split done ...it gives a boost to the share price ... I've just seen it with Coca-Cola ...$.02 extra have

[Shamhorish]

bicente, yesssss     agree as you said    ""bring back the dividend ( even if it minor)  to help the shareholders gain back some lost value""

[clubhouse19]

I fail to understand why a dividend at 1 cent or 1/4 cents per qtr would inhibit the stock from being so volatile ?   Would it make more sense after the RS and as an added incentive to get institutions involved ? ...Possibly !!   Still doesn't make sense in my view.   Dividends are a distribution of profits, and I don't see how any amount, considered profit on the balance

[PabloLafortune]

859, I see no down side to voting yes of consolidation and some upside. No doubt everyone should vote yes to consolidation. I did with Precision Drilling and was richly rewarded.

[Jd007gobbd]

I voted as well but not in favour! Not a good thing!

[Shamhorish]

i voted yes to voted yes to consolidation and to the board consolidation will reduce float == A good thing family in control == BBD WILL STAY CANADIAN

[BBDB859]

Hey Pablo. I'm not saying 100% that consolidation won't be of some benefit. We could get a double bagger in a couple years. But then, it will just start to fizzle. Bombardier just doesn't have the reputation for ever Being a $60 to $80 stock. Where as PD does have a reputation for trading, at those high SP's in the past. I remember trading PD in the late 70's early 80's

[PabloLafortune]

859, I don't know why they are doing it, if its a standalone "move" or part of a plan (securities law is complex and Canada has its own set of laws and rules. Recently happened upon this CW Capital company (symbol CRWN) and they did some corporate transactions that I didn't know a company could do).  I agree the stock is undervalued.  Perhaps because of the debt, lack

[BBDB859]

Hey Pablo. All is well thanks for asking. Well wishes to you as well. The reasons for them doing ithis Consolidation has to do with a few reason according to them. One is reducing the bloated Float and the other is attracting Institutional Investing. I get that. But like I've said before. It's easier to go from $1.50 to $3.00, than it is to go from $30 to $60 or $20 to $40. Some patience

[johnney]

Thet always have a good reason, but this one will be the worst for most shareholders!