Comment by
bicente on Aug 26, 2022 9:58am
I hear what you saying ... why do we allow huge passenger ships to travel around the planet only for pleasure ??? There are many things we can eliminate to save the planet , only to slow down the inevitable , and that is that the planet will cease to exist eventually unfortunately... GLTA e arou
Comment by
jackques on Aug 26, 2022 9:59am
Interdir les Bombes et les guerres Poutine devrait faire partir du lot pres de 10 mois de guerre il en fait des troubles climatique, on devrait commencer par lui
Comment by
bicente on Aug 26, 2022 10:04am
Bien sur , comment nous acceptons que le monde regarde Poutine faire ce qu'il veut ???
Comment by
Shamhorish on Aug 26, 2022 11:12am
it is the french gov that are behind restricted business jets ,,,,, will that affect Macron and other prime ministers travel? may be they will have to take a boat, train or drive or better yet use a bicycle
Comment by
PabloLafortune on Aug 26, 2022 11:58am
As a whole, Air cargo probably consumes 20x or more fuel than business jets. Most of them are old gas guzzlers that consume massive amounts of fuel, they fly a lot of hours and there's a lot of them like perhaps 50-100 over the pacific every day. Focusing on business jets is mis-guided.
Comment by
Truthifest on Aug 26, 2022 12:17pm
Mis-guided for sure, but very visible and in the "we all need to be in this together" vulnerability bucket. The outfight ban seems highly unlikely, but maybe some superficial restrictions eventually get passed. Who knows, but it's potentially a material negative.
Comment by
Shamhorish on Aug 26, 2022 12:19pm
Pablo, as you said "Focusing on business jets is mis-guided." yes but since when those leaders came up with any thing that make sense. who kbows what they will decide later although bbd jets are most fuel effcient, may be they will restricte flying bus jets made in canada for somr eason or the other wghat else can you expect from those guys