Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum BBTV Holdings 7 Unsecured Convertible Debentures T.BBTV.DB

BBTV Holdings Inc is a media and technology company. It provides end-to-end management, distribution, and monetization of content. The company's revenue is generated from direct Ad sales, advertising, content management, and mobile gaming apps. Geographically, the group derives revenue from Canada and India, of which prime revenue is generated from Canada.

TSX:BBTV.DB - Post Discussion

BBTV Holdings 7 Unsecured Convertible Debentures > The problem with using Gross Revenue
View:
Post by Lazaros on Mar 11, 2021 2:03pm

The problem with using Gross Revenue

My main beef with this company is their "revenue" figure.  To make it look like they're a huge organization, they quote gross revenue as their top-line revenue figure ($150m Q4). 

This is highly inaccurate and a source of investor concern. The "gross revenue" was never theirs to begin with.  92.5% of that revenue belongs to the content creators and should never show up on BBTV's books.  They should quote their Gross Margin (what I call net revenue) as their revenue figure, because that is the actual revenue they are entitled to. They would never see the $150m to begin with. Their actual revenue was closer to $4m for Q4.

By quoting $450m in revenue, a normal investor would say "Why the heck are you losing money on that much revenue?".  In reality, if they used their actual revenue of ~$40m, their actuall results looks less troubling.  The CEO really wants to feel she is running a tech unicorn, but the reality says otherwise. This is a $40m revenue company.
 

[rant over]

Comment by marketguru on Mar 11, 2021 4:13pm
Im not sure that is fair Lazaros, its not a $40M revenue company, its a $40M gross profit company (big difference). They are trading at less than 10X gross profit where as their comps are trading at >50X gross profit. Also, their latest financials had the metric BBTV Take to provide more transparency about their revenue figures to make it clear that their take of the gross revenues were lower ...more  
Comment by Lazaros on Mar 11, 2021 5:50pm
Fair enough. I can respect your view on revenue, although I disagree. As for the metrics, they have been, and are, trending in the right direction. Plus is growing - slowly, but growing. They've signed more influencers. Have a plan to grow their gross margin/net revenue to 25% of gross revenue by 2025. They estimate their take will be $300m.  Aggressive, but I wouldn't invest in a ...more  
Comment by Aarman4 on Apr 20, 2021 8:33pm
I don't believe the accountants have a choice in the matter..... Their product generates x revenue..... If they shut down, then it doesn't exist...... The amount they pay out to content providers is cost of revenue.......... In the end, every dollar and cent that flows through the company is tracked, and that is the way we want it.... Cheers
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities