Post by
braincloud on Nov 21, 2015 9:45am
why 2011?
Why are they looking at 2011? If you look at the 2011 annual report there is a discussion about income taxes on page 22. As of Dec. 2011 $235.2 million remains to be recovered in the cost recovery pool representing BNK's cumulative capex of $577.4 million. Although BNK did report an operating profit that year the capex wasn't recovered. It's possible that this is the bone on contention. I'm no accountant , but to a layman, this could be a very simple problem to resolve. I mean BNK reports capex every QTR. The lower the capex the better no? Unless the ALBS are going to challenge every expense through an audit it seems to me this is a slam dunk. There is no motivation for BNK to cheat on what they spent? That year BNK posted a net income of $36 million. This could be just an over zealous finance minister trying to make a name for themselves.
Comment by
braincloud on Nov 21, 2015 10:25am
It also strikes me that it would be a very unique circumstance to have any profit tax ever to be triggered. CAPEX is going to be there every year oil would have to have one heck of a move higher to have a profit in excess of capex. Badwi structured a good deal if my interpretation is correct.
Comment by
braincloud on Nov 21, 2015 3:00pm
The justification is no different anyplace. Here in Canada if CRA says you owe money you have to come up with evidence to support why you don't. The ministry there is either right or wrong. The energy minister even says so. Why they took action to attempt to seize bank accounts is beyond me.
Comment by
dbeaude on Nov 22, 2015 9:09am
I think the article just posted from the Albanian news paper answers the question of why 2011. They are now auditing 2012 and 2013. Sounds like this thing may be just picking up momentum?