Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Baytex Energy Corp T.BTE

Alternate Symbol(s):  BTE

Baytex Energy Corp. is a Canada-based energy company. The Company is engaged in the acquisition, development and production of crude oil and natural gas in the Western Canadian Sedimentary Basin and in the Eagle Ford in the United States. Its crude oil and natural gas operations are organized into three main operating areas: Light Oil USA (Eagle Ford), Light Oil Canada (Pembina Duvernay... see more

TSX:BTE - Post Discussion

Baytex Energy Corp > Climate change
View:
Post by Duster340 on Nov 22, 2023 8:52am

Climate change

Climate change denial (also global warming denial or climate denial) is the pseudoscientific[6] dismissal or unwarranted doubt that contradicts the scientific consensus on climate change. Those promoting denial commonly use rhetorical tactics to give the appearance of a scientific controversy where there is none.[7][8][9] Climate change denial includes doubts to the extent of how much climate change is caused by humans, its effects on nature and human society, and the potential of adaptation to global warming by human actions.[10][11][12] To a lesser extent, climate change denial can also be implicit when people accept the science but fail to reconcile it with their belief or action.[13] Several social science studies have analyzed these positions as forms of denialism,[14][15] pseudoscience,[16] or propaganda.[17]

Many of the issues that are settled within the scientific community, such as human responsibility for global warming, remain the subject of politically or economically motivated attempts to downplay, dismiss or deny them—an ideological phenomenon categorized by academics and scientists as climate change denial. Climate scientists, especially in the United States, have reported government and oil-industry pressure to censor or suppress their work and hide scientific data, with directives not to discuss the subject in public communications. The fossil fuels lobby has been identified as overtly or covertly supporting efforts to undermine or discredit the scientific consensus on global warming.[18][19]

Activities to undermine public trust in climate science are organized by industrial, political and ideological interests.[20][21][22] Climate change denial has been associated with the fossil fuels lobby, the Koch brothers, industry advocates, ultraconservative think tanks and ultraconservative alternative media, often in the United States.[17][23][24][25] More than 90% of papers that are skeptical on climate change originate from right-wing think tanks.[26] Climate change denial is undermining the efforts to act on or adapt to climate change, and exerts a powerful influence on politics of global warming and the manufactured global warming controversy.[27][28]

In the 1970s, oil companies published research which broadly concurred with the scientific community's view on global warming. Since then, for several decades, oil companies have been organizing a widespread and systematic climate change denial campaign to seed public disinformation, a strategy that has been compared to the organized denial of the hazards of tobacco smoking by the tobacco industry. Some of the campaigns are even carried out by the same individuals who previously spread the tobacco industry's denialist propaganda.[29][30][31]

Comment by Kelvin on Nov 22, 2023 9:20am
Duster, All that I know for sure, after having made my living applying thermodynamic principles, is that if the air temperature is getting hotter, then for a given pressure, the water vapor in it will be less likely to condense into micro-droplets aka clouds and less precipitation will fall to the ground. That is a scientific fact. Check out the "steam tables" in any thermodynamics 101 ...more  
Comment by masfortuna on Nov 22, 2023 2:15pm
Okay but 60% of Canada is not arable land due to the permafrost. We will gain more habitable land. And I am not sure how lowering CO2 emmissions in the west is going to improve global CO2 levels when 1/2 the planet's population live in India and China and they are increasing their CO2 levels. Forget the carbon footprint nonsense as that is rigged to get a predetermined reaction. If I consume 5 ...more  
Comment by Elstauncho on Nov 22, 2023 12:36pm
97% of the earths CO2 is natural. Humans make up 3%  do you understand yet?
Comment by Retiredgeo on Nov 22, 2023 12:45pm
The total is 33% since 1850, not 3%.  You are regurgitating misinformation. Humans have significant impact on atmospheric CO2 | Fact check (usatoday.com)
Comment by Elstauncho on Nov 22, 2023 1:10pm
USA today lol  climate change denier?  you lunatics will never give up. Sad you feel the need to be on a stock trading board. Makes  you so sad mad and insecure when people don't listen to your madness.
Comment by masfortuna on Nov 22, 2023 2:19pm
 Actually you are wrong retired.  CO2 makes up .04% of our atmosphere. So actually 100x less than what the poster claimed. And of the only a small fraction (4%) is a consequence of man. You Asked: If CO2 Is Only 0.04% of the Atmosphere, How Does it Drive Global Warming? BY RENEE CHO |JULY 30, 2019    Comments Got a burning question about climate ...more  
Comment by masfortuna on Nov 22, 2023 2:26pm
Sorry I should add that since 1850, the man linked CO2 has increased by 35% making it 7% of  .04% which is a bag full of donuts when you consider that the industrial revolution literally revolutionized the way we function by using coal as an energy source. Incidentally, the worl's population was under 1 billion in 1850 and we now have 8 billion souls on this rock.  Anybody want to ...more  
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities