Comment by
red2000 on Mar 01, 2024 12:13pm
Thank's Uwebb429 ! I see no change compare to Feb. presentation.
Comment by
JohnnyDoe on Mar 01, 2024 12:37pm
Red if you have the February presentation you can see where it cites total debt on page 13 I think it is. Now look at the March presentation and that same number. The math doesn't add, in this case subtract. Feb debt (as of sept 30) - debt replayment > March debt (s of Dec 31)
Comment by
Antonyius on Mar 01, 2024 1:23pm
You're gonna have to elaborate what's wrong, debt went from 2.684 billion to 2.462 billion because they paid down 182 million in credit facilities, 14 mil to the 8.75% notes due 2027 and 27 mil to the 8.5% notes due 2030. Math adds up.
Comment by
JohnnyDoe on Mar 01, 2024 1:50pm
from the news release - how do you get 290 out of that math? 2.684-290=2.394, not 2.462. So what do I not understand then? Maintained balance sheet strength with a total debt to EBITDA(3) ratio(2) of 1.1x. During the fourth quarter we reduced our net debt(1) by 10% ($290 million).
Comment by
Antonyius on Mar 01, 2024 1:56pm
That's because the 290 is for net debt while the 2.462 refers to "total debt" which doesn't include "working capital"
Comment by
JohnnyDoe on Mar 01, 2024 2:11pm
ok, yes, i see what you are saying. i was looking at and quoting total debt. i think it is misleading though because net debt includes regular fluctuations in working capital so they didn't "pay off $290M" per se, they paid off $222
Comment by
Antonyius on Mar 01, 2024 2:56pm
Yeah it's actually very confusing. I only figured it out myself because I was typing up an email to their investor's relations questioning their debt repayment strategy.
Comment by
ztransforms173 on Mar 01, 2024 3:43pm
- WHY are you looking at the March 2024 Investor Presentation for DEBT QUESTIONS when you should be looking at the 2023 Audited Annual Financial Statements ? z173
Comment by
JohnnyDoe on Mar 01, 2024 4:09pm
I looked at the financial statements. They do quote debt in the presentations though. And they didn't really pay off 290 in debt. Their total debt is down 222. The net debt is down 290 but that number fluctuates every month because of working capital fluctuations. It's deliberately misleading imo.
Comment by
dandu1924 on Mar 01, 2024 4:23pm
So how long the BTE management will continue to deliberately misleading with their tricky stuffs. And after that, they have the gut to say " we are doing the best for the shareholders ". In my world , I am calling that the pure hypocrisy like so many politicians are, don't you. They need to change their strategy, otherwise good luck to them at the next AGM.
Comment by
HeavyBanana on Mar 01, 2024 5:07pm
Dandu1924, you accuse the company of misleading investors based on your being a simpleton? If you don't understand the numbers, just leave it at that ...... accusing the company of mafeasance is a heavy charge by a character such as yourself.
Comment by
HeavyBanana on Mar 01, 2024 6:34pm
Dandu1924, the stock went to $9.077 as a high on June 10,2022. Do I sense some malfeacance on your part here?
Comment by
dandu1924 on Mar 01, 2024 6:40pm
Who care about $9 +or- in fact was $9.16 closed with some peak $9.40.... but $9 to $4.36 is amazing, don't you. WOW very nice investment.
Comment by
HeavyBanana on Mar 01, 2024 6:47pm
Dandu1924, did you buy your position at $9.00 plus? Ok, sucks to be you if you did, otherwise your argument is based on a false pretense.
Comment by
dandu1924 on Mar 01, 2024 7:02pm
and now about those who bought at $9 and today $4.36 this is nice investment for them. I am not a day traders, pennies flippers, or shorters, I am real investors who waiting for a good return not the peanuts as BTE dividend WOW, .0225 by quarter. And now I dont feel confortable to talk about my investment in BTE except on this board because I am not the only one to be disappointed.
Comment by
dandu1924 on Mar 01, 2024 4:47pm
So the market did understand that ?? or