Carlisle Goldfields Limited T.CGJ

43-101 etc

[jughead3]

LIke the the previous Poster, further NR's should be coming down the pipe!

Could be  an opportunity! Or?

[chucker6]

Just a note the recent news release says they will use .40 as a cutoff compared to 1,0 gpt used in 2010 resource. Well according to the reports they used.65 as a cutoff, 3 month's to put out a release and they screw it up. They used 1.0 gpt for the hole results, makes me wonder if this is a mistake confusing the two during writing the NR. If so how can it get all the way without someone

[geoboy27]

I don't see the screw up here Chucker. Their last 43-101 used a grade sensitivity table to report the resource based on grade and resultant tonnage /ounces. They used a global resource cutoff of 1 gram to capture this .65 material. Still with me? Now I guess they are using a global cutoff of  .4 g to develop a new sensitivity table for the upcoming report.  Now for the separate issue

[chucker6]

Looks like me, Sorry all.