Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Cline Mining Corporation T.CMK

TSX:CMK - Post Discussion

Cline Mining Corporation > RE: Japan will need a lot of steel
View:
Post by bond46 on Sep 27, 2012 2:49pm

RE: Japan will need a lot of steel

After the Fukosima disaster, Japan has decided to dump nuclear power and replace it with coal power. And so is Germany. Coal will be back in focus and the drawbacks of emmissions will be offset with filtering of the flue gases with scrubbers reducing pollutants by up to 95%. This is what is happening with incinerators today from what I know from personal experience as Power Systems Engineer with the Peel Resource Recovery Inc. These scrubbers are using lime to filter the flue gasses achieving remarkable results up to 98% of clean air coming out to the stack. The only drawback is the disposal of heavy metals which have to be burried deep in the ground. So "clean coal" is in the works, and both Japan and Germany are going to be using coal fuel to power their power plants. If that is so, building so many power plants will need a lot of steel and hence iron ore and met coal. Hopefully, Mitsui will show an interest in CMK as a viable resource in the coming years. Then there is the CO2 emmissions which is a concern, but so is with nat gas. But countries which have a lot of forests it's not of a big problem because the CO2 is absorbed by the trees. The question is the rate of absorption of CO2 and if the generation of this gas is at a higher speed than what the forest can absorb so it does not contribute to the "green house" effect.
Comment by Tinyhopes on Sep 27, 2012 5:14pm
https://resourceinvestingnews.com/43615-nuclear-powers-critical-role-in-world-energy-mix-will-boost-uranium-demand.html?utm_source=Resource+Investing+News&utm_campaign=bba923e503-RSS_EMAIL_CAMPAIGN&utm_medium=emailI am not trying nock your post bond46 read on.tinyhopesNuclear Power’s Critical Role in World Energy Mix Will Boost Uranium Demand1Thursday September 27, 2012 ...more  
Comment by bond46 on Sep 27, 2012 7:15pm
I agree with you that nuclear is part of the solution provided that the population is convinced that this is a viable solution to the energy needs and to climate change. The only drawback of nuclear is in case of a serious accident the process in non reversible and it's catastrophic. And in the case of Japan and Germany the pollution from radiation in case of a serious accident will be  ...more  
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities