Post by
wingshots on Oct 24, 2014 12:53am
Cancelled Contract
Note: Canexus said it is still in talks with the midstream company.?????
Comment by
Calgaryrider on Oct 24, 2014 2:09am
Because their product is worth less at thr other end, they want to negotiate better prices with better terms. Pretty simple. the statement that stunned me is that they are hesitant to sign contracts with others as it will limit their option.....ie long-term value for prospective buyer. As as I said, this'll be resolved in 2 weeks or less.
Comment by
Nodlonian on Oct 24, 2014 7:19am
This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy
Comment by
whitey4$ on Oct 24, 2014 8:02am
The thing is Cus has a duty to try to replace the contract in order to get damages from Meg. So I find the statement that they are not looking for long term contracts ,"because a buyer may not want it " strange,unless the sale is close. Whitey
Comment by
whitey4$ on Oct 25, 2014 1:01am
I would say if Cus does not sue Meg in the near term it would be logical . Mind you if they did sue and Meg bought NATO the lawsuit would be void. whitey