Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum CANEXUS CORP 6.5 PCT DEBS T.CUS.DB.D

TSX:CUS.DB.D - Post Discussion

CANEXUS CORP 6.5 PCT DEBS > "Canada's crude-by-rail exports rise 22 percent in Q3"
View:
Post by MOJOJONO on Dec 03, 2014 7:05pm

"Canada's crude-by-rail exports rise 22 percent in Q3"

Unfortunately... CUS does not appear to have participated very much in this:

https://www.reuters.com/article/2014/12/01/canada-crude-railway-idUSL2N0TL19Q20141201


"Gibson Energy Inc and U.S. Development Group's new Hardisty, Alberta, unit train terminal, which can load up to 120 rail cars, or about 70,000 barrels of crude, in one go, opened in June and ramped up rapidly to full capacity of 140,000 bpd.

Canexus Corp also reopened its Bruderheim unit train facility near Edmonton, Alberta, in early September after a summer shutdown.

However, in its latest earnings release Canexus said it loaded five unit trains in the third quarter, well below its intended 70,000 bpd capacity."

It isn't clear the total capacity of a unit train for CUS.  Digging around the internet it ranges 90-120 rail cars.

Comment by Analysis98 on Dec 03, 2014 10:31pm
Wake up.  Things have changed.  Oil producers no longer need rail, Production is falling, pipelines have capacity and differencial is very small.  Why would a buyer pay 1/2 a billion for Nato now?  And oil producers like MEG have reduced revenue.  Why would they spend 1/2 billion on rail?  TDW warned that this could happen and it has.  Divi is gone.  No ...more  
Comment by Calgaryrider on Dec 04, 2014 11:44am
"No buyer at the required price. Shareholders holding the big bag." Those are the most correct words written in this forum for a long time. How management has maintained their dividend is criminal here. They are both undermining their balance sheet AND at the same time increasing their desperation to submit to a lowball offer for this NATO asset. Accelerating the inevitable puts ...more  
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities