Post by
materialsgirl on Apr 06, 2015 9:27am
Having trouble figuring out what would be a fair share price
You're not alone if you struggle with answering this question
One big financial house is looking for a double over the next 12 to 18 months ($2.75) and of course it is easy to justify a price of $1 $2 $3 or $4. You can supprt the conclusion easily by adding or subtracting a few hundred million dollars to the sale price of NATO. Piece of cake really.
Nonetheless any assumed price can only be siurced from one place; out of thin air.
Have pity on analysts
mat
Comment by
Calgaryrider on Apr 06, 2015 11:34am
Analysts have been chasing the price down since $5 or $6, so give them no more credit than anyone else. In fact, as they've been continually wrong, give them even less credit. NATO is worth only what the free market says, and that value is too low for even Doug to get rid of this asset; the asset he openly and publically disparages at every opportunity.
Comment by
HAWK37 on Apr 07, 2015 12:22am
Adam, well for starters, this isn't a government bond backed by taxpayers. You have to adjust for (considerable) risk. Use 6.5%, which is Canexus cost of debt (the convertibles pay 6.5%). Using that, according to your formula, the IV is $653 million and the value of the equity is zero. hmmm. DS