Post by
Pj1958 on May 03, 2016 12:22am
FT article
is distorting to the public the price hikes , and this kind of reporting borders on illegal behaviour. They state that the eye drops in question have gone up in price from 2 GBP to 29 GBP from May 2013 to April 2016. Thats 2. 5 years which CXR did not even own AMco. the article blames CXR for the price hikes , but they dont state how much they have increased since CXR took over AMco. That is terrible journalism...please tell us how much CXR increased the price by , and don't accuse CXR of these increases.CXR has said they are responsible in their price increases , and until someone has proof that they are increasing drugs by this multiple the they should be ignored. That goes for the other drugs that were mentioned in that article they were all increased over a 3 year period , in which CXR was not even involved....shame on FT for poor journalism.
Comment by
adamchess on May 03, 2016 12:39am
Yes, typical short and distort tactics.
Comment by
Stockcoach1 on May 03, 2016 12:54am
Not to mention that any drug increases in the UK are approved and made in concert with the regulators. I guess the UK government is colluding with CXR and gouging together. Lol.