Post by
curiousbuild on Jun 08, 2016 10:30am
Damage
How much damage have this BO rumours done to share price past few months? I wouldn't be surprised ambulance chasers, fake longs supported by shorts, showing up soon.. I don't know how professionally this had been handled by company and Greenhill either.. what a mess.. Now how ugly it has to get before it gets better on its own fundamentals. CB
Comment by
Bermudashorts10 on Jun 08, 2016 10:53am
Personally I think they should have never begun this BO process and we would be a lot higher. A CEO change would also help. I'm long here and I think think this stock is significantly undervalued with predictable income despite the debt and temporary negative press the sector is getting...50-58 would be a steal IMO
Comment by
curiousbuild on Jun 08, 2016 10:59am
I wish they had done that at CC on earnings day.. CB
Comment by
visionaryfool on Jun 08, 2016 11:05am
Correct me if I'm wrong but I thought the 60 new product launches were NOT included in guidance. These represented upside beyond normal business conditions.
Comment by
sunshine7 on Jun 08, 2016 11:08am
Craig, to put a bit more balance into your post, please put the word 'declining' in front of 'leveraged'. Do you really believe the loophole can be closed in coming year? Gov's don't usually move too quickly.
Comment by
Craigbad on Jun 08, 2016 11:16am
The timeline doesn't really matter as the market is forward looking. It looks like its going to close and its just a matter of when. If they were pitching a growth plan based on exposing the loophole to hedge funds and investors, that money will dissappear in a flash if a buyout comes off the table.
Comment by
DrugPusher on Jun 08, 2016 11:28am
This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy