Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Concordia Healthcare Corp. T.CXR.R

TSX:CXR.R - Post Discussion

View:
Post by curiousbuild on Jun 08, 2016 10:30am

Damage

How much damage have this BO rumours done to share price past few months? I wouldn't be surprised ambulance chasers, fake longs supported by shorts, showing up soon.. I don't know how professionally this had been handled by company and Greenhill either.. what a mess.. Now how ugly it has to get before it gets better on its own fundamentals. CB
Comment by Bermudashorts10 on Jun 08, 2016 10:53am
Personally I think they should have never begun this BO process and we would be a lot higher. A CEO change would also help.  I'm long here and I think think this stock is significantly undervalued with predictable income despite the debt and temporary negative press the sector is getting...50-58 would be a steal IMO
Comment by curiousbuild on Jun 08, 2016 10:59am
I wish they had done that at CC on earnings day.. CB
Comment by curiousbuild on Jun 08, 2016 11:02am
I meant no BO.. CB
Comment by Craigbad on Jun 08, 2016 10:56am
The problem is there will be questions about the fundementals. They are fantastic now, but if the pipeline is based on exposing a loophole that will likely be closed soon, it throws the whole investment thesis out the window. If the growth engine that was supposed give single digit growth disappears, you are left with a large amount of debt and legacy assets which typically decline. It would be ...more  
Comment by visionaryfool on Jun 08, 2016 11:05am
Correct me if I'm wrong but I thought the 60 new product launches were NOT included in guidance. These represented upside beyond normal business conditions.
Comment by sunshine7 on Jun 08, 2016 11:08am
Craig, to put a bit more balance into your post, please put the word 'declining' in front of 'leveraged'. Do you really believe the loophole can be closed in coming year? Gov's don't usually move too quickly.
Comment by Craigbad on Jun 08, 2016 11:16am
The timeline doesn't really matter as the market is forward looking. It looks like its going to close and its just a matter of when. If they were pitching a growth plan based on exposing the loophole to hedge funds and investors, that money will dissappear in a flash if a buyout comes off the table.
Comment by DrugPusher on Jun 08, 2016 11:28am
This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities