Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Concordia Healthcare Corp. T.CXR.R

TSX:CXR.R - Post Discussion

Concordia Healthcare Corp. > Recent Seeking Alpha article by “Canuck Investments”
View:
Post by TOMMY1 on Jul 23, 2016 2:20pm

Recent Seeking Alpha article by “Canuck Investments”

Just to keep this article in context, if you have enough of an outrageous post title - “Concordia International Is A Sewer” should do it, then you will of course drive more traffic to your article resulting in a $0.01 reward for the author per page view. This author is counting on a lot of reads so they can pay the bills. This is why we see so many poorly written articles on Seeking Alpha - anyone can become a contributor - even you!
Author payment on Seeking Alpha: $35 + $0.01/page view
 
CXR is a hot topic right now due to the price volatility and the battle between the shorts and longs and so you write about a stock investors are concerned about, you are going to get a lot of reads, even if you don't have much to say besides regurgitating the last two articles you have aleady written. We get it Canuck Investments, you don't like CXR.

The author “Canuck Investments” is clearly a disgruntled stock holder, given that they have felt the need to write three scathing "bearish" articles about CXR. Perhaps they were burnt from the CXR stock drop we have seen over the past year and is out for blood. When you sell a stock at a loss, then the gloves are off as you have nothing to lose except try and pile on with the shorts to drive the stock price down. Feels good to rant and do what you can to negatively impact the company you hate.
 
There is always a motive for writing an article like that with limited fact basis. All analysts get it wrong and I don't buy on analysts' ratings alone. But for those of you who do, analysts who have had a deeper look at CXR have placed price targets way above current levels:
“Canuck Investments’ response to this underpriced stock:
According to these valuation metrics, the stock looks cheap. Too cheap. In fact, it's too good to be true and I believe the stock is your typical value trap whose P/E will correct once the true earnings are realized in the long-term. 
Okay, so when a stock is oversold, it is now "too cheap" and "too good to be true". Honestly. To me, that is opportunity. Curious if stockholders will actually sell based on what a Seeking Alpha author "believes". I would be surprised if an author with 990 followers will cause more panic selling of the herd mentality - kudos to Canuck Investments for trying. 
 
Anyway, that is my take on this and I’m not selling just yet. 

Oh, and I should disclose that I am infact a long stockholder of CXR and I do not receive $0.01 each time someone reads my post.

User image

 
 
Comment by FullReversal on Jul 23, 2016 2:31pm
I always knew that SeekingAlpha, Fool and Stockhouse were fool bait attracting weak and novice investors into the lions' dens.  Investors who start investing look at these sites thinking they are there to help investors but they, in fact, are not.  Even credible media is often fooled by manipulator messages.  I'm even questioning places like th Globe etc. I don't have ...more  
Comment by TickerTwit on Jul 23, 2016 4:40pm
Quality control is weak on SeekingAlpha. “Canuck Investments” is a known quality problem there. My own crossings with him/her have been over articles on mining stocks where the author's lack of knowledge has been profoundly disturbing for its potential to mislead uneducated investors. One posted comment on the CXR article: "Right now Concordia is bleeding cash." [written by the ...more  
Comment by LatticeInExile on Jul 23, 2016 5:03pm
This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy
Comment by TickerTwit on Jul 23, 2016 7:49pm
I posted about the SA article's statement on "bleeding cash", and nothing else. Your post goes in other directions. I'll bow out of the thread now and leave it to you and others who wish to discuss those other items. .
Comment by LatticeInExile on Jul 23, 2016 10:53pm
This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy
Comment by LatticeInExile on Jul 23, 2016 11:01pm
This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities