Post by
cg16 on Oct 17, 2016 12:31pm
Ryhigh's numbers
Ry I appreciate the work you have done on analyzing the numbers. I understand that you don't like adj ebitda but the company's guidance is only provided in Revenue and adj ebitda. I'm probably not alone in saying that the bottom line for investing in this company now is heavily dependent on whether they can meet their Q3 guidance. Based on your ebitda estimates of Q3 $112mm and Q4 $106mm, is it safe to say that your numbers (if shown in adj ebitda) show them beating their high adj ebitda number of $540mm?
Comment by
ryehigh2014 on Oct 17, 2016 1:08pm
To followup however. Even if they do not beat they will be OK. A 1.10 GBP/USD Q4 rate and -10% revenue growth rate q/q is a pretty 'worst case possible' assumption
Comment by
PROtrading on Oct 17, 2016 1:15pm
Like the numbers disagree on worst case! Worst case is Notes owner pushing for liquidation and with a tangible book value of -98$ per share, stockholders get ZIP, NADA, just a DELIST and a tax write off on non-registered accounts.
Comment by
cg16 on Oct 17, 2016 1:15pm
What is your estimate for Q3 and FY revenue and adj ebida? Because it seems as though your ebitda number is similar to the run rate of Q1/Q2? thanks again.
Comment by
ryehigh2014 on Oct 17, 2016 2:01pm
Yes expense forecasts are based n Q1/Q2 run rates however revenues are not. Revenue ~880MM, Q3 Revenue 223MM - haircut on CXRX NA and International revenues of -6% and -4%. Finally Adj EBITDA is 476MM simply by adding by non-cash charges as well as share comps. EBITDA less impairment is 451MM. Thanks Hamza
Comment by
cg16 on Oct 17, 2016 3:10pm
Thanks again. So International grew 8% q o q last quarter and you now have them -4%? My prediction is that US drop is bigger than 6% but lets hope not. it looks like you have them meeting top end of revenue guidance which is $888m for the year but missing adj ebitda lower end of guidance (which $510m) by $34m or 6.7%.. wasn't ebitda for Q1 $109m?
Comment by
ryehigh2014 on Oct 17, 2016 3:22pm
Yup Q1 107MM. I think a -10% drop of top of the line revenue is reasonable. Revenue assumption is the backbone of all of this For revenue vs. EBITDA its hard to project. The issue is that the cost structure for management is unknown.. margins for NA increased slightly and International businesses increased considerably in Q1 and Q2 (depsite the GBPUSD drop).
Comment by
cg16 on Oct 17, 2016 4:30pm
Rye, so Ebitda is actually not falling much at all but adj ebitda is? just comparing your projected Q3/Q4 ($112m/$106m) ebitda to Q1 ($107m). No growth but not eroding much either. Q1/Q2 actual adj ebitda was ~$280m so why if ebitda stays similar for H2 do you project only $196m in adj ebitda vs the actual ~$280m in H1?
Comment by
ryehigh2014 on Oct 17, 2016 7:57pm
Also. Please expect these numbers to change when Q3 numbers come out. Just wait would be my suggestion. But yes I expect the company to delever to 4x by 2020. They will absolutely be able to refinance