Hugs (abrazos), no bullets( balazosa). Is predicated on more quality jobs not losing 60% of high quality jobs and tax.
steering away from Pemex will need lots of copper and silver vs closing 60% of mining
camimex (Mexico Mining) has stated that there is no evidence a open pit is less environmental or safe than other extractive methods
if Ebrand and Alicia are indeed international investment people that "develop" Latin America vs not develop then banning 60% of mining would 1. Be a purposeful head fake 2. You can kiss other near shoring and jobs and literally throw out the USMCA agreement
I think porc has some kinda mental obsession / illness with discovery (vs other open pits) he fails on basic logic it's bad or it's not...not some are ok) and what happens 20 years from now when those pits are empty and you have constitutionally handicapped yourself?
im still fully in (as opposed to porc who owns no shares - why is he even hanging out on all Discovery's boards?) yes we understand the risk - Mexico goes BACK to 3rd world vs keep progressing with near shoring and production. I don't see how that is progressive or good for the people of Mexico.
you will have to hug the cartel because there will be no jobs.