Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Eloro Resources Ltd T.ELO

Alternate Symbol(s):  ELRRF

Eloro Resources Ltd. is a Canada-based exploration and mine development company with a portfolio of gold and base-metal properties in Bolivia, Peru and Quebec. It is focused on developing its potential Iska Iska silver-tin polymetallic property in the Potosi Department of southern Bolivia. The Iska Iska Porvenir Concession is a road accessible, royalty-free property that covers an area of 900... see more

TSX:ELO - Post Discussion

Eloro Resources Ltd > Down the rabbit hole (part 2)
View:
Post by OgnyQ4 on Aug 26, 2023 10:49am

Down the rabbit hole (part 2)

Saint Cristobal have low grade oxide or, that can't be proceed with existing facilities(build for sulfide). 
That kind of or could came from ELO.
IMO, Crescat is loosing time and money if trying to depressed SP in order to achieve better deal .(and that is pure speculation from my side)

But, think about this :

That's gonna be quite a big hub and spoke operation. But with the sorter(OPEX~0,07$/t), ore  to the plant could be reduced to less than 10 000 tons per day. The othet 40 000(SCM capacity is 50 000) could came from their own deposit(low grade sulfide ore) and some other suppliers (Bolivian cooperatives producing metals for  over 2 billion usd per year using entirely that strategy)
10 000 tons per day(could be less) and with 110t cargo wagons, the transportation cost should be less than 10$ per ton.
Spur Line building to SCM should be less than 70 million usd.
Now,
compare that with at lest 2,5 Billion dollar CAPEX for building similar to SCM facility at ISKA ISKA.
It is clear, that the economics is there.
What is not there is a common-sense approach from SCM owners (IMO only)
If so, they are doing a big mistake. Bolivian government was very clear in its intentions to have 5 new mine OPERATING till 2025 elections. SCM management coud learn it, in a difficult way, what means to not abide to that will. Then, there will be no court in Bolivia to help them. Many still believe, that Saint Cristobal shouldn't be sold to  foriners.

Comment by OgnyQ4 on Sep 01, 2023 11:13pm
Just try to link my post above with : listen after min 1:08.       https://www.youtube.com/live/PUJpk0j96Lc?feature=shared Because, this days everybody gives advice to Tom, I will give him one of mine : We(me and my wife), as a proud shareholders of a little bit more than 70 000 ELO's shears, respectfully demand the managment : - to delineate this tremendous deposit to the ...more  
Comment by OgnyQ4 on Sep 01, 2023 11:18pm
This is the post 
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities