Exro Technologies Inc T.EXRO

E-propelled oldest patent

[Seraphim1]

Dates to 20/05/2019. All Exro patents precede that date with exception of one, which is a battery patent. Probably frivolous then.

[John4434]

I read it the other way around. This epropelled company had their patents in 2009.

[WsrThanWenYungr]

Where is the information on the patents?

[jboom70]

Link They both have approved patents that cover their products.

[Inuk138]

It's pretty clear for EXRO they summitted their patten but for ePropelled I did not see anything!

[WsrThanWenYungr]

Thank you. I found the link and saw that EXRO patents go back as far as 2009. Is there a similar listing of ePropelled patents?

[IMB51479]

Free publicity! Reading through the patents I can't find enough similarity for a valid claim. Looks like Epropelled is jealous of Exro's marketing success. Looking to cash in on EXRO's coattails  https://insight.rpxcorp.com/litigation_documents/14591334

[jakayo6]

This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy

[Danno13]

Yes I agree with you.There a private company looking for publicity so they can list on the Nasdaq.

[John4434]

Unfortunately you do not decide. In the meantime forget about nasdaq,count on the price to drop below a dollar and maybe even back to 30 cents. The money they are spending building crapp and paying people will soon render them broke and with a stock price on life support raising money will be doomed. Major issues and this was going to be a breakout year? Try a broke year.

[Ghandof]

Go bash somewhere else 

[SIMPLICITI1]

My oh my! How all knowing of you Johnny Boy!

[lscfa]

Wrong... https://patents.google.com/?assignee=Epropelled+Limited

[Pandora]

Assignee name EXRO TECHNOLOGIES Assigned properties (8) Note: Results display only for issued patents and published applications. For pending or abandoned applications, please consult USPTO staff. Patent number Publication number Application number PCT number International registration number Assignee name 11081996

[gossamer5]

This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy

[Pandora]

Might be easier if we knew which patent they are claiming is the problem. Only reference to the latest patent 11081996 is this clause: The various embodiments described above can be combined to provide further embodiments. To the extent that they are not inconsistent with the specific teachings and definitions herein, all of the U.S. patents, U.S. patent application publications, U.S. patent

[iiioiii]

You're looking for patent U.S. 7,382,103, which is currently held by ePropelled and relates to their eDTS technology. https://patents.google.com/patent/US7382103B2/en Thier news release relating to the supposed patent infringement can be found here: https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/epropelled-files-patent-infringement-lawsuit-against-exro-technologies-inc-301466767.html

[Pandora]

Thanks iiioiii, It's been around since 2008, Assignment abstract of title for Application 10576573 Invention title/Inventor MAGNETIC GEARING OF PERMANENT MAGNET BRUSHLESS MOTORS Nabeel Ahmed Shirazee, Praveen Choudhary Patent 7382103 Jun 3, 2008 Publication 20070024220 Feb 1

[Pandora]

For anyone that may be interested and inclined to compare the two patent languages here is a short summary of the descriptions: (Note - the ePropelled also makes reference to a Canadian patent 2341095 which is from 2001-03-16 which is further to a Chinese patent of 2000-04-05(?) "STATOR WINDING FOR A VARIABLE SPEED BRUSHLESS DIRECT CURRENT (DC) MOTOR" Abstract and first 5 claims for

[SIMPLICITI1]

That is really getting into the weeds! Thanks.  Interesting that E-Propelled references two utility patents that I would think are at or near expiration (20 years total shelf life).  Happy to let the legal beagles earn their keep!

[Moemoney42]

Thanks Pandora... the way I read it is although both companies are trying to attain the same results the methods of attaining those end results are fundamentally different.. I'll go on record to say this claim by ePropelled goes no where.. and I stand by my comment that EXRO should counter sue for damages by this feable attempt to cloud the waters.. IMHO.. 

[ddogold]

Agreed . Take the fight to them . I’ve added this morning