Post by
JiffBeasauce on Sep 21, 2020 6:22pm
lenders to amend the three-year term credit facility
so i guess this means they are pushing loan payments for 1 year in exchange gor 1.5 % intrerst raise? They say this is positive showing re asurance of the crediter but is it? Or do they see it as there only posibility of getting payed back? curious on what this says to investers?
Comment by
JiffBeasauce on Sep 21, 2020 6:28pm
0.75% higher intrest not 1.5% ***
Comment by
maritimedreamer on Sep 21, 2020 7:06pm
Would this be a normal course of action as the renegotiation occurred: The requirement for a minimum restricted cash balance has been removed and that balance has been used to repay a portion of the term loan outstanding? I believe they had to withhold 3 mil for this and they now used it to pay a portion of loan off?
Comment by
JiffBeasauce on Sep 21, 2020 7:17pm
intristing, hopefully its a we dont need it situation. The fact they had to amend terms "The requirement for a minimum restricted cash balance has been removed" show that supreme could be low on cash and cash raise coming shortly? I guess If supreme can be profitable right away could run on tight budget in short term, we will find out soon...
Comment by
Method on Sep 21, 2020 8:16pm
Actually, the removing the restricted cash requirement means that they aren't worried about their being enough cash to make the payments. Generally, a bank makes a company restrict some cash to protect themselves. It makes more sense to remove the restriction now that the size of the facility has been reduced as well. I would say that change is a net positive.
Comment by
puppymonkeybaby on Sep 22, 2020 8:44am
you are a very simple minded old man, arent you George.