In a number of her interviews and poscasts she state she was here to build shareholder value.
She is no idiot. She knew that Fire was a take over target with such a low shareprice and with all of the initiatives in the works. It was clear to everybody that the MJ industry was perfect for consolidation.
So my next question is to her and the BOD is , this environment was clear. Fire was a takeover target and you stated you were focus on shareholder value, why did you not put a poisin pill clause in place. It would have:
May have prevented or discourage hostile takeover attempts.
It would have allowed existing shareholders the right to purchase additional shares at a discount, effectively diluting the ownership interest of a new, hostile party.
So many questions I would love to ask the CEO and the BOD.