Post by
parahyangam on May 04, 2022 8:01pm
Olympic Dam
From the company's website:
".............NICO is an Iron Oxide Copper Gold (“IOCG”) class deposit, also commonly referred to as Olympic Dam-type after the dominant “Super Giant” deposit in South Australia that defines this class".
What exactly has the company done for the last 20 yrs. to either prove or disprove that NICO 'could' be a 'super giant'?
South Australia's IOCG/Olympic Dam is an enormous operating mine. To put this out on the corporate website without drill results is audacious.
NICO's declared resources come nowhere close to Australia's IOCG mine assets.
So why is Australian reference still on the company website? So far there has been NO INFORMATION or CONFIRMATION one way or the other.
This is malparactise.
How many Fortune shareholders have been led to believe that there is an underlying substance to this claim? And have misinvested.
Comment by
Jim1712 on May 04, 2022 9:31pm
Say what? Lol. The Olympic Dam has never been a reason to invest. It's icing on the cake. Jim.
Comment by
parahyangam on May 04, 2022 9:42pm
You are correct. Fortune has a 'super giant'. It is called Arctos.