NanoXplore Inc T.GRA

FWI

[1student]

Having said all that was contained within my last most recent post, allow me to ask what in sam hell is GRA managment waiting for to provide an update on precisely what stage of development the VoltaXplore jointly owned venture is at, i.e. should it be developed at all since the last news release claiming such a partnership had been formed?

The CEO certainly likes to brag about the cost effectiveness vs.spherical graphene. He suggests NanoXplore's process for producing EV battery cell anodes incorporating silicon onto or within a graphite based anode material, is much more cost efficient than (cheaper than) the spherical graphene process which other Quebec based companies are relying on and touting as the most cost efficient process for incorporating silicon within or onto a graphite based anode material.

Has NanoXplore's CEO been simply talking out of his anus; or, does he actually have the intention to prove his assertion by way of the long touted and not as yet materialized VoltaXplore enterprise client contract.
I refer to a certain world renown company which is clearly advertised as potentially providing VoltaXplore a very lucrative and product affirming contract. A contract which would  allow for additional support which would have VoltaXplore being a go to producer of proprietary battery cell anode materials, battery components and complete batteries for battery cell industry manufacturers and automotive  manufacturers as well.
Part of the primary reasoning as to why I provided the forestated commentary and posed my question in the specific way I chose to do so, is as follows.

Currently, representatives for a Battery Materials company based in Vancouver, B.C. Canada have certainly been 'busy as bees' signing non disclosure agreements or NDA's with some of the world's largest and most profitable battery cell and complete EV battery manufacturers, as well as  a certain electric automotive manufacturer in particular.
Such NDA signatories are said to be individually and collectively interested in testing and thereby confirming the 'commercial viability' of battery cells manufactured utilizing a 'proprietary', one pot, comparatively extremely low cost and mass scale industrial process for integrating silicon upon graphite or silicon upon other anode and/or cathode materials, within battery cells.
The company I refer to boasts a management team comprised of former LG Chem and former Samsung SDI  representatives, professionals who posess enviable skills, education and accompanying experience; and has fashioned and maintains a 'fundemental' relationship with Yonsei University-Industry Foundation ("YUIF") in South Korea.
The company I refer to also boasts the proprietary technology required to enable a would be industry leading 5 minute superfast EV battery charging cycle.
I can go on all day speaking about what the referred to company's management has claimed it's proprietary technologies are capable of providing to EV battery manufacturers and for the global electric automotive industry participants and consumers at large; I won't.

Sufficed to ask, what exactly is delaying that which is supposed to be one of the primary drivers and massive revenue generators for the stakeholders vested of the VoltaXplore enterprise, NanoXplore being just one of the vested stakeholders?
You would think that Martinrea International Inc representatives would be striking while the iron is hot, so to speak?

[Stockfshr]

Why hold back the name of the battery materials company you refer to? Silly. It is of course Neo Battery Materials Ltd. (NBM/V).  They use a nano coating on a silicon anode. I don't recall the company ever suggesting that the nano coating has graphene. Could you point me to a reference for this? Per the  company:  NEO Battery Materials Ltd. patented technology utilizes

[savyinvestor333]

Thank You for the name of the company. Sometimes i feel I am reading a Sherlock Holmes mystery when reading 1students posts

[1student]

 Stockfshr stated, "They use a nano coating on a silicon anode. I don't recall the company ever suggesting that the nano coating has graphene. Could you point me to a reference for this?"    Response: To point out the obvious for you, Stockfshr, I will emphasize the fact being that Neo Battery Materials has had everyone interested in knowing more about the specific

[1student]

Silly? LOL! Silly rabbit tricks are for kids. Clearly, trying to 'trick' readers into thinking  I suggested NBM.V was utilizing graphene as comprizing the nano and micro elastomer coating; is not what I intended. Although, I do have somethig more to contribute regarding that particular subject. Instead of commenting on the abilities of the management team over at NBM.V , I'd

[j1nxed]

Soroush has said that it is very different between lab and commercial production. I like the fact that they are not hyping the battery initiative just yet, if they solve the problem of industrial production then i promise you they they will sign deals left and Right. Non binding MoU doesn't mean much, but supply contracts does *hint*

[1student]

Soroush isn't telling anyone anything new, j1nxed. As to you having stated, "if  they solve the problem of industrial production then i promise you they will sign deals left and right", I'll simply retort the following. 'If' is not something which justifies a CEO and the representatives of the company's majority investor, Martinrea International Inc, deciding to

[multilex]

See slide 9 for a VoltaXplore update from Martinrea. It's on track and I expect supply agreements to be signed next year after commissioning of the demonstration facility.  Nanoxplore update

[1student]

Hello multilex. I don't need slide shows or any other visual aids in order to determine that the whole concept of VoltaXplore actually becoming a viable and quite profitable partnership with Martinrea International Inc, is not anywhere near certain. Although, such a fact didn't stop Soroush &Co. from advertising Samsung as a 'contract' partner fro VoltaXplore. When does the

[multilex]

I guess you really don't know Rob Wildeboer - no one eats his breakfast, lunch or dinner!  Bet the jockey, not the horse!  GLTA.

[1student]

LOL! Perhaps I should ask Mr. Stronach who Rob Wildeboer is, lol. It's simple. It's either you are getting into the EV batteries manufacturing, supply and distribution business; or your not. This bullpuckey about a 'go or no go date is some kind of lame attempt by or on behalf of the folks over at Martinrea International Inc to simply fill the slideshow page with anything at all to

[JimmyBly1]

For once and I reckon not only this time Student is pointing out to very true and valid points out of his boiling cranium. This company and major unvestor MRE have used so many times the buzz words to go ahead and attract investors that at the end of the day, slideshows are not enough anymore and equals just as a promise or good will gesture (ie intention). Someone said tbey demonstrated the

[j1nxed]

The market is forward looking, you don't seem to look at all. I am betting with my own money that they will sell a lot of grapheneblack 5 years from now, didn't you sell below $2 cad? in any case you have made a bet that they won't (even after the supply contracts). Keep posting because it hits a new ATH when you do!

[j1nxed]

The demonstration facility has already gotten the "go", are you referring to the 10GW (i think it was 10gw) battery plant? are you suggesting that they skip the pilot plant and build a battery factory first? You think they will be able to go to a bank and secure debt without having a proof that it works and is scalable? I understand that it seems like nothing is happening, but i don'

[1student]

Hello j1nxed Clearly I was referring to the Martinrea International Inc VoltaXplore slide show; speciifcally, the expected sometime in 2022 'go or no go' decision to pursue the EV battery product line and presumably, anything to do with the VoltaXplore partnership venture. As I stated, " the whole concept of VoltaXplore actually becoming a viable and quite profitable partnership

[j1nxed]

I just have to ask if you have watched the interviews with Soroush? I am not even sure what you are asking of him, what entails moving haven and earth for the battery plant... skipping a pilot plant and pouring 100% equity capital into a commercial plant? I haven't questioned your belief in nano, bit i fail to actually understand what you want them to do (something concrete) to appease you in

[1student]

Yes, I have watched one particular interview which Soroush took part in. Somebody here was nice enough to post the link within a post at this bulletin board, j1nxed. When a CEO says something during an interview, I full well expect such a CEO to be well able to support his assertions with respect to more favorable costs associated with utilizing NanoXplore's graphene process for manufacturing

[goodbuddy]

*By the time this demonstration facility is given the go or no go plenty of competitors would have already eaten what would be VoltaXplore's breakfast, lunch and dinner, so to speak. I don't think I will lose any sleep over that statement, the battery market will be 1/100 of what VoltaXplore wants to produce with their 10 Gw factory. Lets just enjoy the ride....

[1student]

Hello goodbuddy You in part stated, "the battery market will be 1/100 of what VoltaXplore wants to produce with their 10 Gw factory." Did you mean to suggest that VoltaXplore's proposed and yet clearly no where near existing 10 GWh contribution to fulfilling expected future demand for global EV battery production, would merely be 1/100th of required global production capacity going

[savyinvestor333]

What are you talking about. Our share price is up 70% in the last 3 months Not many other companies in any sector can match that. Some people are hard to please.

[1student]

That's correct. I stated "By the way, which ride are you speaking to. The share price is doing a two step kind of dance. Nothing to really be excited about; let alone enjoy.  There were plenty of rides during plenty of stages to get to this current share price, savyinvestor333. I am simply referring to the most recent moves in GRA's share price. I am certainly not displeased

[goodbuddy]

Yes, that is right about fulling fututre demnand. Demand for batteries go far beyond the Auto industry and there has been research papers that depict battery demand that would require many more factories the size of Tesla's to meet demand. As for enjoy the ride quote; the stock price is growing at a very decent rate of return even when considering when the price stays flat for a period of time

[smallcaps2grow]

Its going to be sooner than that, it is coming into canadian fund radars now nearing a Billion. 1 fund needs to buy between $5 and $60M. They dont like when it takes more than 3 weeks to buy. As we noticed trading is increasing subsantially with rising price (a good sign). Atomatic inclusion in index at 1.2B.  This is a no brainer, especially with profitability at doorstep and large blue sky

[goodbuddy]

I listened to Martinrea's webcast, it ojnly took 7 minutes into the webcast to talk about Voltaxplore. I interpret that as Martinrea was making a statement!

[goodbuddy]

I forgot to add this, Voltaxplore is only $8 million dollar company, thats cool. Only takes an 8 million dollar company to have a spot in the first 7 minutes of a billion dollar company as they are describing their financials.