NanoXplore Inc T.GRA

The Paradigm Capital calculations do not . . .

[1student]

"During a late afternoon news conference where she launched pre-budget consultations that run until late February, Freeland focused her comments on the need for the budget to make the country more competitive and innovative."

Oh well, no chance of major newly alloted federal government budjeted monies and resources being provided to the proposed VoltaXplore enterprise until well beyond February.

That leaves the Quebec provincial government's representatives to drive that particular EV battery materials and battery cells manufacturing bus all by itself until then?

Looks more and more like a massively dilutive $500 M financing,i.e. if NanoXplore principals and Martinrea International principals even bother to give VoltaXplore the "GO" directive.

It's like I said within my previous posts, it is either the next news release is going to serve in somehow demostrating a derisking of NanoXplore's need to raise $500M of capital by way of a entirely dilutive equities offering or "The Sword of Damocles" would be freed from the string which holds it above our respective share positions; thereby serving to more than halve our positions.

[Lire02]

All this talk of dilution is a bit misguided. Assuming any issuance of new shares dilutes existing shareholders , the only real concern is that any dilution be accompanied or proceeded by an increase in existing share price. Shareholders get a smaller share of a more valuable enterprise and if the company is to grow, that form of dilution is pretty much a certainty that I, for one, would welcome!

[1student]

Hello Lire02 You stated, "All this talk of dilution is a bit misguided. Assuming any issuance of new shares dilutes existing shareholders , the only real concern is that any dilution be accompanied or proceeded by an increase in existing share price." RESPONSE: Precisely how would you propose that NanoXplore principals go about ensuring "that any dilution would be acompanied