Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Greenlane Renewables Inc T.GRN

Alternate Symbol(s):  GRNWF

Greenlane Renewables Inc. is a Canada-based company, which provides biogas upgrading systems. Its systems produce clean, renewable natural gas from organic-waste sources including landfills, wastewater treatment plants, dairy farms, and food waste, suitable for either injection into the natural gas grid or for direct use as commercial vehicle fuel. The biogas upgrading systems, marketed and... see more

TSX:GRN - Post Discussion

Greenlane Renewables Inc > CBC article - perception of NG (moderately interesting)
View:
Post by fairweather1 on Jan 29, 2021 1:45pm

CBC article - perception of NG (moderately interesting)

You might find this article moderately interesting about the history of NG and the eco-friendliness of its name. Reminds readers that it's still a fossil fuel.

As an aside, I suggested the editor do an article on RNG, particularly given that Canada has world leading tech (ie: GRN). 

https://www.cbc.ca/news/technology/what-on-earth-natural-gas-methane-1.5891975
Comment by wobbles on Jan 29, 2021 1:56pm
CBC has a terrible bias against anything petroleum. It is disgusting that Canadians pay for their slanted reporting. RNG is part of improvement. Of course it's a fossil fuel, but the increasely left of centre CBC feeds the illusion that there is this massive switch labelled with the word 'Green', and our anti-petroleum fearless leader Trudeau has only to reach up and pull it and become ...more  
Comment by westcoast1000 on Jan 29, 2021 3:33pm
Wobbles We do not need to read your political opinions. They are not relevant. Most do not think CBC reporting is disgusting. If you do, that is your business, not ours. 
Comment by oceaneleven on Jan 29, 2021 3:44pm
westcoast needs a big bad spanking....No need to attack the posters here..this is a BULLBOARD for caring & sharing.......Bullying is not accepted.........
Comment by westcoast1000 on Jan 29, 2021 4:52pm
Ocean, I did not attack a poster. I told that person their political views are best kept to themselves. That is good advice. Care and share about the stock, not about the Prime Minister. 
Comment by wobbles on Jan 30, 2021 9:55am
Westcoast - Articles and viewpoints that don't present RNG or other reclamation technologies in the proper context should be critiqued. When a taxpayer funded media congomeration wants to play favourites because of their bias, I will definitely speak about it. If you think politics doesn't affect the investments we make, that denial/naivety is your problem. Deal with it.
Comment by westcoast1000 on Jan 30, 2021 12:52pm
You deal with it genius. I am not interested in your opinion about the CBC. Should I go on here screaming to the world my love for the CBC and my contempt for the National Post? It makes no sense. If you want to go on about your political views there are better outlets for your brilliant opinions. I am done with your views. 
Comment by BCdude on Jan 30, 2021 9:46pm
The funniest part about Wobbles argument is that the article isn't about RNG -- it's about natural gas. The irony is that he's proslteizing about media bias when his own bias is shining through pretty clearly. You should at least read an article before complaining about its bias. LOL.