Post by
fairweather1 on Jan 29, 2021 1:45pm
CBC article - perception of NG (moderately interesting)
You might find this article moderately interesting about the history of NG and the eco-friendliness of its name. Reminds readers that it's still a fossil fuel.
As an aside, I suggested the editor do an article on RNG, particularly given that Canada has world leading tech (ie: GRN).
https://www.cbc.ca/news/technology/what-on-earth-natural-gas-methane-1.5891975
Comment by
westcoast1000 on Jan 29, 2021 3:33pm
Wobbles We do not need to read your political opinions. They are not relevant. Most do not think CBC reporting is disgusting. If you do, that is your business, not ours.
Comment by
oceaneleven on Jan 29, 2021 3:44pm
westcoast needs a big bad spanking....No need to attack the posters here..this is a BULLBOARD for caring & sharing.......Bullying is not accepted.........
Comment by
westcoast1000 on Jan 29, 2021 4:52pm
Ocean, I did not attack a poster. I told that person their political views are best kept to themselves. That is good advice. Care and share about the stock, not about the Prime Minister.
Comment by
wobbles on Jan 30, 2021 9:55am
Westcoast - Articles and viewpoints that don't present RNG or other reclamation technologies in the proper context should be critiqued. When a taxpayer funded media congomeration wants to play favourites because of their bias, I will definitely speak about it. If you think politics doesn't affect the investments we make, that denial/naivety is your problem. Deal with it.
Comment by
westcoast1000 on Jan 30, 2021 12:52pm
You deal with it genius. I am not interested in your opinion about the CBC. Should I go on here screaming to the world my love for the CBC and my contempt for the National Post? It makes no sense. If you want to go on about your political views there are better outlets for your brilliant opinions. I am done with your views.
Comment by
BCdude on Jan 30, 2021 9:46pm
The funniest part about Wobbles argument is that the article isn't about RNG -- it's about natural gas. The irony is that he's proslteizing about media bias when his own bias is shining through pretty clearly. You should at least read an article before complaining about its bias. LOL.