Comment by
autofocus111 on Jan 17, 2018 5:51pm
That's ~15% of their total oil production offline, and premium light oil to boot. They better get this sorted out pronto.
Comment by
XperiaTee on Jan 18, 2018 2:32am
from my understanding this is more like 8% of production isnt it? where did you see the 15%, just curious.
Comment by
SQCConsulting on Jan 18, 2018 7:11am
It is only 8%....... Unbelievable...just when there was light at the tunnel. Typical
Comment by
Dogsbreakfast4U on Jan 18, 2018 8:39am
The fact that management did not deem necessary to inform minority shareholders that this incident was under investigation by an outside regulatory body since May 7 is what is most troubling. Perhaps they thought this was not significant enough or perhaps they just didn't care or both! What else are they not telling us?
Comment by
Scottie99 on Jan 18, 2018 8:03pm
This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy
Comment by
autofocus111 on Jan 18, 2018 10:10am
Oops. Yeah you're right. I was looking at Antlantic 35 vs Total 245. Still, a healthy chunk of production and premium light grade not the tar goop. https://huskyenergy.com/news/release.asp?release_id=2198454
Comment by
SQCConsulting on Jan 18, 2018 12:48pm
Leverage to postpone re-instatement of the dividend. Not sure its coincidental
Comment by
SQCConsulting on Jan 19, 2018 6:07am
It just seems like an exceptionally punitive measure that it begs more questions as to why they had to go this far. It must be because they failed to listen to them in taking appropriate planning steps immediately after the incident despite several warnings. Not exactly gold star management here.
Comment by
SQCConsulting on Jan 19, 2018 6:42am
UPDATE: Seems directly related to a decision to brace for impact instead of disconnecting and going clear of the berg. Takes a couple of months to re-set the operation if they disconnect and steer clear....so they gambled lives for $. This seems to be the issue. Board had no confidence in their operational decision-making. Hard to argue the contrary.
Comment by
pablo87 on Jan 19, 2018 1:55pm
It all goes back to governance. The entire board is controlled by LKS and there is NO oil & gas knowhow on it other than the CEO and former CEO.
Comment by
pablo87 on Jan 19, 2018 1:57pm
I should add, another lack of regulation by the government as to governance. They thought it was ok for the 30% Canadian shareholders not to be represented but now they are putting the Canadian environment at risk as well.
Comment by
SQCConsulting on Jan 19, 2018 5:08pm
Seems arbitrary but that is the point, they believe it was a cost saving decision over lives. They had to know it was within the disconnect range otherwise it pointless. Peabody also admitted it was the wrong decision.
Comment by
SQCConsulting on Jan 19, 2018 7:20pm
So why did Peabody admit fault and acquiesce to everything....?
Comment by
Scottie99 on Jan 19, 2018 7:34pm
This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy
Comment by
mrbb on Jan 19, 2018 10:09pm
hey chicken sh!t, you too scared to reply to me directly? you put me on ignore but like to reply on my post to your posse, you chicken sh!t
Comment by
mrbb on Jan 19, 2018 10:13pm
So you are husky basher hyppcrite who continue want to own husky stock but hated the company. Stupid do what stupid does.
Comment by
autofocus111 on Jan 20, 2018 9:38pm
You are absolutely correct. HSE failed to follow their own safety protocol, and now they will likely have to pay a fat fine and will surely face increased scrutiny in their operations going forward.
Comment by
Olympic on Jan 26, 2018 9:37pm
SeaRose resumes production. https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/newfoundland-labrador/husky-searose-suspension-withdrawn-1.4506408
Comment by
mrbb on Jan 27, 2018 4:58pm
No mention of pending monetary penalty. Cross our fingers. Hope this is a good lesson for husky with minimal damage.
Comment by
SQCConsulting on Jan 19, 2018 5:04pm
Precisely, they lack confidence in management because they were monitoring the ice berg and decided not to disengage and steer clear despite it being within an evacuate range. They even decided to call out "brace for impact" in case it hit. This is what they are questioning...the decision not to disengage and steer clear.
Comment by
Dogsbreakfast4U on Jan 18, 2018 3:10pm
Leverage to keep the dividend low. Not a coincidence.