Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Interfor Corp T.IFP

Alternate Symbol(s):  IFSPF

Interfor Corporation is a Canada-based forest products company. The Company and its subsidiaries produce wood products in Canada and the United States for sale to markets around the world. It operates through the solid wood products segment. The Company’s product categories include Dimension Lumber, Specialty Lumber and Engineered Wood Products. Its products include Spruce-Pine-Fir, Douglas Fir... see more

TSX:IFP - Post Discussion

Interfor Corp > Worthy of a repost...
View:
Post by sunshine7 on Jul 22, 2021 11:03pm

Worthy of a repost...

Catching the Falling Knife With the market freaking out about plummeting lumber futures, its worth looking at some future financial prospects based on a range of scenarios. The Georgia Pacific acquisition as reported by IFP leaves out a few details and cherry picks others. Using IFPs Q1 sales price of $903/mbf and the reported GP margin of $508/mbf we get a COGS of $395/mbf. Lower than IFPs Q1 GOGS of $512.48/mbf. Pretty attractive. To arrive at the reported USD$53m EBITDA those GP mills sold 104mbf in Q1, implying about 80% of capacity ex DeQuincy. So maybe some upside there. IFPs Q1 had minimal contribution from the Westrock Summerville mill, so we can say that the 666mbf in sales was at the low end of potential sales of 800mbf per quarter of production/sales capacity ex the GP purchase. Pulling together IFP + Summerville + GP capacity we get to 3,920mbf per annum. For modeling purposes, a quarterly number of 830mbf is pulled out of the air, representing about 89% of capacity ex DeQuincy. Weighted average COGS using IFPs Q1 $512.48/mbf and GPs imputed Q1 of $395.00/mbf is $496.59/mbf or $500.00/mbf rounded. For modeling the future, production of 830mbf/q, COGS inflated by 5% to $525/mbf, bumping G&A to C$25m/q and duties at C$15m/q are used. An f/x of 1.20 is the assumption here. Residual/log sales of $90m/q is added to revenues. The big question of course of the future price of lumber. Rather than guessing, how about a range of EBITDA outcomes. Using the above assumptions and the following lumber prices in USD, the resulting quarterly CAD EBITDA is: $500/mbf $25.1m 600 124.7 700 224.3 800 323.9 900 423.5 1,000 523.1 1,100 622.7 1,200 722.3 1,300 821.9 1,400 921.5 Coincidentally, about $100m in EBITDA per $100/mbf in lumber price change. Fun. So thats half of the EV/EBITDA equation. What does a Q2 proforma balance sheet look like post GP acquisition? Were assuming Q2 EBITDA on $1,300/mbf of $682m, dividend of $130m, cap ex of $35m and the GP purchase of CAD$450m. Taxes dont flow through the EBITDA calc but do require cash so deduct about 20% of EBITDA or $135m. Opening net cash of $243m plus the foregoing gets a proforma net cash position of $175m. And dont forget Hammond, which has the potential to add even more cash to the equation. Take a $30 share price for market cap of $1,950 less cash of $175m for an EV of $1,775 and lay that on top of the EBITDAs provided to come up with your multiple. At $500/mbf thats 17.75x, $1,000/mbf is .85x, etc. IFP is either very expensive, shockingly cheap or something in between, depending on your assumptions. Our thinking is the probabilities skew towards cheap. And yes, the assumptions and calculations can be wrong and constructive input is appreciated.
Be the first to comment on this post
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities