Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Largo Inc T.LGO

Alternate Symbol(s):  LGO

Largo Inc. is a Canada-based producer and supplier of vanadium products. The Company’s segments include sales & trading, mine properties, corporate, exploration and evaluation properties (E&E properties), Largo Clean Energy and Largo Physical Vanadium. Its VPURE and VPURE+ products, which are sourced from one of the vanadium deposits at the Company's Maracas Menchen Mine in Brazil. The Company... see more

TSX:LGO - Post Discussion

Largo Inc > Corporate culture based on transparency
View:
Post by kha341 on Aug 15, 2021 8:15am

Corporate culture based on transparency

On May 13 in the Q1-21 Earnings CC, Paulo Misk said this about the first iron ore sale: “We are pleased to report that the company completed its first sale of iron ore in April from the Maracs Menchen Mine. We would like to highlight that our first sale of iron ore was a key step in validating the commercial viability of this material and also highlight the added benefit of our new established internal sales divisions, while capitalizing the higher iron ore price environment. We continue our active discussions with end users for this material and expect to complete additional sales of our material in 2021”


In the same non-interactive CC Andrew Wong asked: “Iron ore is sitting around $230 per tonne in China. With iron ore at record levels, what are your options from monetizing the stockpiled ore at Maracs Menchen Mine? Have you been able to sell any more? And what kind of profit do you expect to realize at these prices? Paul, let me hand this one over to you”

Paul Vollant replied: “Yes. Thanks, Andrew. As I mentioned before, since the first iron ore sales in March, we have concluded a couple more with local customers in Brazil. And today, we're in advanced discussions with several domestic and international buyers. From a commercial point of view, we see the current price levels as a real opportunity for Largo to maximize sales and profits from its iron ore product. And really, our goal is to try and seize this window of opportunity as much as possible. So we're working very hard at it"


“Completed its first sale of iron ore in April” meant delivered and paid. It meant that the “sodium” problem was discovered and communicated by the Chinese before they paid any amount in April. It also meant that Management knew about the margin of US$0.007/kg in April. And yet they continue to present to the public a rosy iron ore picture until finally admitting the shaky future of this “solid waste” (non-saleable due to the presence of sodium) after pressing questions from analysts in the Q2-21 CC on August 11.


How can we take what is said by Management at its face value from now on?  For Management to build credibility and earn our trust, the BoD must, to say the least, establish / impose a corporate culture based on transparency.  

Comment by Theturk12 on Aug 15, 2021 6:30pm
Paul Vollant wrote:    “Yes. Thanks, Andrew. As I mentioned before, since the first iron ore sales in March, we have concluded a couple more with local customers in Brazil. And today, we're in advanced discussions with several domestic and international buyers. So what did these other customers say about the inclusion of sodium in the iron ore? If they said too much sodium then ...more  
Comment by kha341 on Aug 15, 2021 8:07pm
I Imo they were not able to sell any iron ore in Brazil at all even though they tried very hard. I know that it is difficult to follow Palo Misk’s explanation but this sentence is quite revealing: “Paul, myself, have been reaching many companies in Brazil and firstly, initially, we thought that our high-grade of titanium and so do iron ore, it will be just a matter of diluting them. If we plan ...more  
Comment by st_esteban on Aug 15, 2021 9:30pm
Not someone but the board as a whole.  Paul migth be the one who lied openly but to think that he is acting alone is naive. The board had this information the moment China refused to buy the shipment... One of the board responsibilities to shareholders is to provide timely information on material matters that can impact investment decisions.  Not only was this information not provided ...more  
Comment by kha341 on Aug 15, 2021 10:21pm
Paolo, EC and other members of the Management team who were present when Paul provided misleading information about the first iron ore sale in the Q1-21 CC did not say a word to set the record straight back then. At least Paolo contradicted Paul in the Q2-21 CC. Management knew all about the Chinese rejection of our iron ore due to the unnatural presence of sodium since last April. And yet ...more