Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Excelsior Mining Corp T.MIN

Alternate Symbol(s):  EXMGF

Excelsior Mining Corp. is a Canada-based mineral exploration and production company. The Company owns and operates the Gunnison Copper Project in Cochise County, Arizona. The Gunnison Copper Project is an in-situ recovery copper extraction project that is permitted to produce approximately 125 million pounds per year of copper cathode production. The Company also owns the past producing Johnson... see more

TSX:MIN - Post Discussion

Excelsior Mining Corp > PI Coverage Initiated
View:
Post by PhotonicsGuy on Feb 25, 2021 4:48pm

PI Coverage Initiated

Two things I don't like about it...

1. They used LOM AISC of $2.10/lb, which is ~60% higher than what MIN used in the FS. Basically, they included all the expenses of Stage 3 Capex without including the resulting copper produced under Stage 3, which is unfair IMO.

2. They used a Discount Rate of 10% instead of 7.5% for NPV calcs, which I think is too conservative. MIN is on the cusp of production with all risks accounted for (permitting/financing/construction) with the exception of some remaining execution risk.


PI Coverage Link
Comment by rexrex on Feb 25, 2021 5:27pm
Thanks PG, lots to read here. I am sure many are happy with this report. It puts Excelsior as a potential takeout candidate. I will read more before posting. Thanks again
Comment by Lenny1K on Feb 25, 2021 6:47pm
The Pi analysis reinforces a question I had raised. It refers to $58 million cash on hand, after the $32 million proceeds of the offering (in Canadian dollars). Therefore, the company had $26 million Canadian on hand prior to the offering. Why do the offering when you have these kind of funds on hand? There was no cash crisis.  Wouldn't you wait for expected good news, on the production ...more  
Comment by CopperWave on Feb 25, 2021 6:59pm
Agreed, I've asked IR the same question without a direct response other than the typical response of wanting to maintain safe cash buffer. Personally speaking, if I was CFO I certainly wouldn't have raised cash at these levels solely for the purpose of maintaining a cash buffer. My only hope is that the PP was raised to bring attention to Excelsior from analysts in hopes to promote this ...more  
Comment by rexrex on Feb 25, 2021 7:13pm
Cash raise when they didn't need cash can only mean one thing. Excelsior will be taken over and management is likely to give itself substantial cash bonuses as they exit. After all this project has taken 10 years and bonuses or golden parachutes in the millions is truly deserved. Of course takeover price has to be great as well. I think Excelsior will be taken over around the $2.50 mark, now ...more  
Comment by metalhead666 on Feb 25, 2021 9:08pm
They had no such cash. They fully tapped a line of credit when they couldn't source acid...all of it at onerous interest rates too.  They were essentially broke prior to the PP