Nano One Materials Corp T.NANO

LawIsFun

[Starsearcher80]

LawIsFun, your purpose here, clearly paid to sow doubt, it honestly now so transparent that it is laughable.  You've already been banned permanently from the ceo.ca site, and rightly sow.  While that hasn't happened here, you have to know that literally everyone here sees your singular purpose, despite your overt effort to somehow protect us.

I'm a strong believer in looking at things from all sides.  To that end I expend a huge amount of effort to disprove my own theories. But that is substantively different than your thinly veiled effort to cast doubt, day in day out, post after post after nauseating post. 

If you were a carton of milk, your expiry date was truly months ago.  That you're still in the fridge, only reminds everyone here that you really need to be taken care of, if only via the ignore function.

[Lawisfun]

I disagree. And the fact remains I recommended people not buy into the hype at $3, $2.75, $2.50, $2 and recommended they wait for as I stated, "a red letter day" when they could buy Nano shares for under $2.  All came true as if gospel.  You told people to buy Nano at $3, $2.75, $2.50, $2 and now again at under $2.  My only hesitation buying at these levels is

[dalriad60]

So your point here seems to simply be - 'I was right'? Okey dokey. - plse give it a rest Lawman if you're legit. You out yourself as a basher tho with all this insistance on being right and 10 posts a day. Who tf cares or has the time unless being paid? It's a fkg stock man, not your life. 

[Lawisfun]

Today we were discussing the existing patents out there that various companies have for single crystal CAM (e.g., Tesla and Nano).  We touched on how Nano's is likely superior tech.  How is this bashing at all?  I certainly learned a lot from others engaged in the discussion today. Stuff I was not fully aware of (thanks everyone for sharing by the way).  Sure there was

[dalriad60]

Agreed. Glad you're back Starman. Engagement with trolls earns their pay.