Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Nano One Materials Corp T.NANO

Alternate Symbol(s):  NNOMF

Nano One Materials Corp. is a clean technology company with a patented, scalable and low-carbon intensity industrial process for the low-cost production of high-performance lithium-ion battery cathode materials. It specializes in the production of low-cost, high-performance cathode active materials for lithium-ion batteries. Its technology is applicable to electric vehicles, energy storage, and... see more

TSX:NANO - Post Discussion

Nano One Materials Corp > Any more questions?
View:
Post by contrap127 on Jun 27, 2024 3:41pm

Any more questions?

Let's steer the future of energy in the right direction! 
https://x.com/NanoOne_NANO/status/1806371770125193562


Good luck to all shorts!
Comment by Lawisfun on Jun 27, 2024 4:02pm
Interesting that the Argonne table references a total CAM production of 27,500TPA implying the Candiac 1 expansion to be 2,500TPA.  Dan has repeatedly referenced the automation scope would increase nameplate from 200TPA to 1,000TPA.  Sometimes Dan references 1,000-2,000TPA.   Personally, I expect the Candiac 1 expansion to only be 1,000TPA (the minimum).  But if Nano ...more  
Comment by Lawisfun on Jun 27, 2024 4:27pm
It's a shame that the IDTechEX publication groups Nano One at the same level as Sylvatex in the section, "Cathode material innovations".  I guess both Nano One and Sylvatex are at the same level in the sense they have both shipped out LFP samples to their customers for evaluations and neither Nano or Sylvatex have confirmed offtake contracts or commercial plant plans yet. Just ...more  
Comment by Lawisfun on Jun 27, 2024 4:33pm
I guess 6K feels bad about being equated to Nano One considering 6K already has offtake contracts, goverment funding, and a commercial plant (~25,000TPA) already in construction.  6K must feel it unfair to be compared to Nano One who has no offtake contracts, no goverment funding for a commerical plant, and no commerical plant plans/construction timelines yet.
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities