For months now ncp has been trading sideways with
next to no " new news ".
Scanning the trades each day
i'm begining to think this market signal site actually has merit
when paired with ncp trades.
https://www.pennystockdream.com/Market-Maker-Signals 15:57:26 | M | 0.02 | | 10 | 80 National Bank | 80 National Bank | E |
15:03:13 | T | 0.02 | | 1,000 | 79 CIBC | 14 Virtu ITG | K |
15:03:13 | T | 0.02 | | 1,000 | 79 CIBC | 14 Virtu ITG | K |
15:03:13 | U | 0.02 | | 1,000 | 2 RBC | 14 Virtu ITG | K |
15:03:12 | T | 0.02 | | 1,000 | 79 CIBC | 14 Virtu ITG | K |
15:03:11 | T | 0.02 | | 4,000 | 79 CIBC | 14 Virtu ITG | K |
15:03:11 | U | 0.02 | | 1,000 | 2 RBC | 14 Virtu ITG | K |
You may laugh and mock my posts ( 2busy2 )
But the fact of the matter is... the market should take a second look
at my findings.
Simply ask, why the plats were never fully pulled from magnetite
why the exotics never factored
why 2013 reassaying file is gone from Yukon website
why was wellgreen divided into upper lower mafics
why are the pits so shallow while deep drills go beyond
why did 2017 press erase 86% of resource when deep drills support
why was a course grind used ( met ) when fine metallics are in silicates
why were sulphides and gabbs - separated ( wow )
why were Cr, Ti not fully measured
why no iron credit like other peers
why so many zone name changes
why boundary chsnges
why cutoffs tweaked
I would say my posts with ( digging up past reports ) support more tonnage.
Asking me to write 3 sentences
to sum up the past 8 yrs of continual changes is absurd...
My question to the market ?
Why aren't we seeing a retake on the 2023 pfs ?
lol
I remember reading up on a certain geologist who was assigned to
an African gold deposit. That story unfolds with the geologist writing a report
that said there were not enough gold oz in the ground vs raw tonnage to
support the oz of gold once claimed.
Sounds similar to, ncp.
Yet... if i pull forward wellgreen's west zone owners,
what name would i find ?
Personally,
i think i've done a superb job resifting wellgreen.
By doing so, there are numerous questions left unanswered.
And.... another day, month passes on this stock without a flinch.
Chief question others should be asking ?
Just how much tonnage could be amassed - not measured - below
shallow pit shells including the mine.
My hunch ?
Someone is partial to their " bore holes ".
Borehole data - sweet spot ( 516 holes in and under mine )
The kind that racks up mass tonnage real fast.
Same holes tested / reassayed in 2013.
The same 2013 ( reassaying file ) nowhere to be found.
Even more tonnage with new stepout holes - like
johnson's 756m Higher grade as one drills deeper.
Lower strata hosts mega ore.
Yet... shareholders thrown a shallow pitshell ?
Put that in your pipe - 2busy2