Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd T.NDM

Alternate Symbol(s):  NAK

Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. is a Canada-based mineral exploration and development company based in Vancouver. The Company’s principal business activity is the exploration of mineral properties. The Company’s principal asset, owned through its wholly owned subsidiary, Pebble Limited Partnership, is a 100% interest in a contiguous block of about 1,840 mineral claims in Southwest Alaska... see more

TSX:NDM - Post Discussion

Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd > No Proven/Probable “Ore Reserve” Classification?
View:
Post by RealityCheck123 on Apr 01, 2021 5:36pm

No Proven/Probable “Ore Reserve” Classification?

Why?
Comment by paths on Apr 02, 2021 12:16pm
NAK is a Canadian company and so is required to comply with the CIM classification guidelines which specify that the term "ore reseve" cannot be used. The term "mineral reserve" can be used, but only if it is known to be economically mineable, after dilution and other losses. This has to be supported with at least a PFS study. The problem is that these steps are tied in with ...more  
Comment by RealityCheck123 on Apr 02, 2021 12:46pm
Who are the "we" you are referring?  Lets hope its not the proponent/applicant.  That would be troubling.   My previous post identified +/-10% accuracy, not to within "10% accuracy".  Significant difference.  Yes, a PFS meeting legal requirements, in order to determine proven/probable reserve/ore identifying viable economic development, is needed ...more  
Comment by paths on Apr 02, 2021 1:20pm
The "we" is anyone following stocks online, who can see all of the nonsensical law suits being attempted. I am assuming that is why a PFS is not available through the company. The company has done their own, and one person from management has said that it can be done on the back of an envelope by anyone familiiar with the costs.  No feasibility study comes with any sort of ...more  
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities