Post by
RealityCheck123 on Jan 27, 2022 11:09am
Why no hostile take over?
Major copper/gold miners' have likely assessed the project. Why no interest at these prices?
Comment by
TELEMARKER on Jan 27, 2022 12:45pm
Hostile not in the cards For all we know there are advanced discussions going on So far Biden has cancelled Keystone pipeline, Minnesota mine Resolution Copper in Arizona is pending (BHP and RioTinto) HBM Rosemont in Arizona is in court
Comment by
RealityCheck123 on Jan 27, 2022 1:02pm
For all we know there are not. Other projects have no bearing. Thank you.
Comment by
TELEMARKER on Jan 27, 2022 2:56pm
US copper production is 65 % of US consumption Without new mines the % will decline due to increasing demand and declining production from existing mines https://www.northerndynastyminerals.com/site/assets/files/4617/ndm_presentation_corp_january19_2022-web.pdf https://www.miningnewsnorth.com/story/2020/09/25/opinion/a-lot-riding-on-alaskas-pebble-mine/6457.html
Comment by
RealityCheck123 on Jan 27, 2022 3:35pm
Thats why the US imports copper and will continue to do so irrespective.
Comment by
TELEMARKER on Jan 27, 2022 4:20pm
Cu is one of many strategic metals. Who wants to dependant on foreign sources when there domestic resources, jobs at stake Canada, US imports nurses, doctors from less developed countries who need them more, Shame
Comment by
RealityCheck123 on Jan 27, 2022 6:34pm
Sorry, copper not strategic, critical or rare.
Comment by
TELEMARKER on Jan 27, 2022 6:40pm
strong disagree, US kust minimize dependancy on foreign supply if things get ugly the current mantra is electrification, EVs or have you missed that Disposal of tailings on land is proposed, disposal in ocean out of the question