Comment by
lscfa on Aug 03, 2015 6:31pm
The valuation does not look unreasonable either. 6 month adjusted ebitda is $11 million US x 1.30 FX rate x 2 = $28.6 million Cdn mkt cap 1.50 x 243 million shs. = 364 million Cdn ratio = 364 / 28.6 = 12.7x
Comment by
lscfa on Aug 05, 2015 3:03pm
revisiting valuation question: annualized adj. ebitda = $28.6 million Cdn remove 12% for NHL => $25.2 million Cdn mkt cap = $0.75 x 243 million shs. = $182 million ratio = 182 / 25.2 = 7.2x
Comment by
charm7 on Aug 05, 2015 3:07pm
This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy
Comment by
lscfa on Aug 05, 2015 3:09pm
How do you know that the NBA and NFL don't have 5 years remaining on their contracts with NLN?
Comment by
charm7 on Aug 05, 2015 3:27pm
This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy
Comment by
lscfa on Aug 05, 2015 3:47pm
NLN is not just about the NFL and NBA. It has over 160 college clients and there are hundreds of small leagues worldwide where distribution rights are not an issue. Plus NLN is growing its non-sports TV Everywhere division. Regarding competition, see slide 18 of Investor presentation below:
Comment by
charm7 on Aug 05, 2015 4:06pm
This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy
Comment by
lscfa on Aug 05, 2015 4:13pm
and you sound like a bashing jackass. MLBAM did not magically appear recently. They have been around for years and NLN has been doing just fine....
Comment by
charm7 on Aug 05, 2015 4:26pm
This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy
Comment by
Craigbad on Aug 05, 2015 3:07pm
Fixed expenses stay the same so simply taking 12% off ebitda is not even close to reflective on the damage done to ebitda by losing this large amount of revenue, nice try though.
Comment by
lscfa on Aug 05, 2015 3:14pm
Not true. A large part of NLN business model is servicing a client with labour. When the client is gone the resources are redeployed to new clients or reduced (i.e. reduce NLN staff)
Comment by
Craigbad on Aug 05, 2015 3:23pm
Huge fixed costs and huge r and d spending which is not paying off as it is, but even worse when clients aren't retained. This was my reason to short, but losing large amounts of top line can take out huge amounts of ebitda, not just 12%, more like over 50-60%. We will see, i may cover at 60-65 cents.
Comment by
Craigbad on Aug 14, 2015 1:52pm
I warned you all at $1.20 when i was shorting. If this doesn't hold 60 cents next support is 30 cents.
Comment by
charm7 on Aug 15, 2015 9:28pm
This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy
Comment by
thedave2006 on Aug 03, 2015 10:20pm
looking good, but eps is still a loss. https://ca.finance.yahoo.com/news/neulion-reports-second-quarter-revenue-211607295.html cheers, dave.
Comment by
retiredcf on Aug 04, 2015 9:35am
Typical market overreaction once again sets up an excellent buying opportunity. GLTA
Comment by
eric7 on Aug 04, 2015 9:39am
This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy
Comment by
retiredcf on Aug 04, 2015 9:52am
I almost never average down but I couldn't resist in this case. GLTA