Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Verde Agritech Ltd T.NPK

Alternate Symbol(s):  VNPKF

Verde AgriTech Ltd is an agricultural technology company that produces potash fertilizers. The principal activity of the Company is the production and sale of a multi-nutrient potassium fertilizer marketed in Brazil under the brands K Forte and BAKS, Silicio Forte, and internationally as Super Greensand (the Product). K Forte is a potash fertilizer that is a source of potassium, silicon, and... see more

TSX:NPK - Post Discussion

Verde Agritech Ltd > Principal Risks and Uncertainties #23
View:
Post by 15Stanmore on Apr 03, 2021 9:53pm

Principal Risks and Uncertainties #23

Hello fellow Verde Shareholders,

As observed in a previous post the 2020 Financial statements Principal Risk and Uncertainties section contains 23 individual risk headings compared to only 6 in the 2019 financial statements. Just to avoid any confusion on the reader’s part, the introduction to the Risk section then goes on to say: “The risks noted below do not necessarily comprise all those faced by the Group.” 23 separate and distinct risks in 2020 and there could be more.  This pronouncement obliged a concerned shareholder to go through each one very carefully, trying to comprehend and assess the nature of the risk and how it might impact my investment.

I thought my fellow shareholders might appreciate hearing some of my comments regarding individual risks identified and communicated by management. Let’s start with number 23 which I quote here in full:

The Cerrado Verde Project is Managed by a Subsidiary

The material operating subsidiary for the Cerrado Verde Project is Verde Fertilizantes. The managers (“administradors”) of Verde Fertilizantes are Felipe Paolucci CFO and Elton Golaves, Mining Engineer, but the ultimate control of Verde Fertilizantes is with Cristiano Veloso, Director and Chairman. Despite the controls that the Group has put in place, there may be risks associated with ensuring that the corporate actions of Verde Fertilizantes reflect the decisions of the Board of Directors and management of the Group.

Really?

Verde Agritech plc (“Verde”) is a UK registered corporation with no active operations of its own: it is essentially a holding Company which owns shares of its operating entities, Verde Fertilizantes Ltda (“VFL”) and FVS Mineracao Ltda (“FVS”) which are incorporated and carry on business in Brazil.

Verde owns 100% of VFL, 84% directly, and the remaining 16% indirectly through 100% owned GB01N Limited (an inactive shell Company whose only assets are the VFL shares).

Verde owns 100% of FVS, 0.005 directly, and the remaining 99.95% indirectly through VFS, which it owns 100% as noted above.

In any event, the consolidated financial statements of Verde report the activities of all the separate legal entities as if they were a single combined company. Indeed, page 38 of the Notes to the Financial Statements state under Note 2.2 state:

Where the Company has control over an investee, it is classified as a subsidiary. The Company controls an investee if all three of the following elements are present: power over the investee, exposure to variable returns from the investee, and the ability of the investor to use its power to affect those variable returns. The consolidated financial statements present the results of the Company and its subsidiaries as if they formed a single entity. Intercompany transactions and balances between group companies are therefore eliminated in full.

Mr. Veloso is the Chairman of the Verde Board and the Verde CEO. Mr. Paolucci is the CFO of Verde.

The Board of Directors of VFL and its officers comprise the following individuals:

Mr. Veloso
Mr. Paolucci
Mr. De Medeiros
 
The Board of Directors of FVSand its officers comprise the following individuals:

Mr. Veloso
Mr. Paolucci
Mr. De Medeiros
 
So how do we deal with the supposed risk “associated with ensuring that the corporate actions of Verde Fertilizantes reflect the decisions of the Board of Directors and management of the Group”?

Here is an easy solution. If the Board and officers of VFS do not carry out exactly the decisions of the Verde Board and management, immediately fire Mr. Veloso, Mr. Paoucci and Mr. Medeiros from their positions at VFS. As far as I can ascertain, having Mr. Veloso and Mr. Paoucci as local, onsite, day-to-day managers of the operating subsidiaries guarantees that the instructions they issue themselves are fully reflected in their direction and management of the subsidiaries. 

The inclusion of this risk leaves me scratching my head and frankly wondering as to the state of mind of the person who wrote it, and those that determined it should be retained and included as the 23rd Principal Risk in the 2020 financial statements.

Cheers,

S

Comment by junior_miner on Apr 04, 2021 6:42am
Thanks Stan for following up and clarifying the situation. The wording (it can be understood either way) of the risk made me think the sudsidiary would be owned by CV. But if it is owned by the company, it's ok. " The Cerrado Verde Project is Managed by a Subsidiary The material operating subsidiary for the Cerrado Verde Project is Verde Fertilizantes. The managers (“administradores ...more  
Comment by 15Stanmore on Apr 04, 2021 7:37am
Hello junior_miner, The subsidiary companies have always been owned 100% by the corporate entity. Mr. Veloso is the largest single shareholder of that parent entity, currently holding 10,201,547 of the 50,416,015 issued and outstanding shares of NPK. His parents also hold another 800,000 or so shares and I would assume he gets to vote their shares as well, so he currently controls about 22% of ...more  
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities