Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Obsidian Energy Ltd T.OBE

Alternate Symbol(s):  OBE

Obsidian Energy Ltd. is a Canada-based exploration and production company. The Company operates in one segment, to explore for, develop and hold interests in oil and natural gas properties and related production infrastructure in the Western Canada Sedimentary Basin directly and through investments in securities of subsidiaries holding such interests. It has a portfolio of assets producing... see more

TSX:OBE - Post Discussion

View:
Post by JohnJBond on Apr 02, 2023 3:36pm

Q1 2023

Q1 2023 is now complete.

It was an ugly quarter.    From an investors point of view, it was characterized by OBE and WTI testing and bouncing off near term lows.  

WTI got into the US$60's and OBE into the C$7's.

What does that mean for OBE's Q1/23 performance?

AND (more importantly)

Is that performance already in the share price?

Mgmt has given us some clues.    On Jan 30/23 OBE put out a News Release in which they gave OBE's Funds Flow from Operations sensitivity to various price changes.

Variable Range Change in 2023 FFO ($ millions)
WTI (US$/bbl) +/- $1.00/bbl 8.6
MSW light oil differential (US$/bbl) +/- $1.00/bbl 5.5
WCS heavy oil differential (US$/bbl) +/- $1.00/bbl 3.1
Change in AECO ($/GJ) +/- $0.25/GJ 3.2

We know what FFO was in Q4/22, and we know what the average prices were then.

It follows that if we look at the difference in the above prices between Q4/22 and Q1/23, and apply the above sensitivities, we should get a rough idea of how FFO has changed from the prior quarter.   (note this will not account for changes in volume - ie it assumes volumes are similar from Q4/22 to Q1/23.    In reality, Q1/23 should have higher volume that Q4/22.    This increase is an unknown.    If its positive, then the actual Q1/23 FFO should be higher than indicated here).

WTI US$/bbl    $82.56   vs     $76.05     Difference is 6.51
 
MSW Light oil differential (US$/bbl)   $2.96    vs   2.01     Difference is 0.95

WCS Heavy oil differential (US$/bbl)  ($27.91)    vs    (19.78)     Difference is 8.13

Change in AECO ($/GJ)   $6.02    vs    $3.25    Difference is 2.77


The AECO number is complicated by the existance of hedges. 

 
AECO Swap October 2022     26,065     4.74
AECO Swap January 2023 – February 2023 14,976 23% 6.18
AECO Swap March 2023 31,562 48% 4.58

From these hedges, it looks like the post hedge price in Q4/22 and Q1/23 were about   5.47  vs  3.91  with a difference of 1.56

Applying those changes to the sensitivities we get (they must be divided by 4 to make it a quarterly number)

WTI  -6.61 x 8.6 = -56.85 million

MSW Diff -0.95 x 5.5 = -5.23 million

WCS Dif 8.13 x 3.1 = 25.20 million

AECO 1.56/0.25 x 3.2 = -19.97 million

Added together it is -56.85 (this would be the difference if it applied to a whole year).    It applies to one quarter, so the change on FFO from Q4/22 to Q1/23 (assuming volumes unchanged) is about -$14.21 million.

The FFO in Q4/22 was $110.5 million

Applying the above price changes, suggests FFO in Q1/23 of about $96.29 million.

To repeat what I wrote above, this assumes volumes are unchanged between the quarters.   This is unlikely.

In Q4/22 average boe volume was 31,742 boe.

Q1/23 average boe volume should be higher than Q4/22.   This number is presently unknown. 

Q4/22 production was reduced/delayed by cold weather - ie expect a bounce back in Q1/23.

Q1/23 production may easily of been 4% higher than Q4/22.    That will increase the Q1/23 FFO by an unknown about, but at least 4%.    That would put it close to $100 million ish.

Now for the important part - what does that mean for the share price?

IF we use the above $96.29 million in FFO and 82 million shares, that is about $1.17 FFO/share in Q1/23.    (if volume increased to about 33,000 boe, then its abotu $1.22 FFO/share)

Annualize $1.17 in FFO/share, and you get $4.68 FFO/share.

The closing price on March 31/23 was C$8.63

That is 1.84x annualized Q1/23 cash flow (assuming no increase in volume from prior quarter).

1.84x FFO is a very low number.   (comparables are in generally in the 3's)

All told, product price wise, we just went though a bad quarter (probably the worst quarter of this year).

The share price is trading about 1.84x FFO.     This assumes product prices do not increase through the rest of the year.    (ie based on the low product prices witnessed in Q1/23)

Given the current low FFO multiple, it appears the poor product prices of Q1/23 are currently baked into the share price.

The above are back of the envelop applications of sensitivity information provided by OBE.   The intent here, was to get a rough idea of how bad Q1/23 is going to be when the Q1/23 numbers are released.

AND

To get a feel for what impact that report may have on the current share price.

Instead of doing this on the back of an envelop, I did it here on stockhouse.    There may be errors above (I've not proof read this).    I've answered my questions to my own satisfaction.  

It seems to me that Q1/23 is likely to come it at around $100 million in FFO.  

It seems to me that the current share price is trading at about 1.8 ish times Q1/23

To me, that means two important things.

1.    Even thought Q1/23 was bad, OBE probably still had FFO of around $100 million

2.    We don't know what Q1/23 capex was, but I'm assuming it was about $100 million.   ie, even in a bad Q1/23, with OBE spending aggressively on capex, they still likely matched FFO to capex!

3.   The current share price is rediculously cheap (in absolute and comparable terms) based on really bad Q1/23 product prices.    ie, all the Q1/23 bad product price news is already in the share price.

Note that as of this date, the WCS differential has continued to contract.
Comment by JohnJBond on Apr 02, 2023 4:40pm
Here is a fun fact. If Q1/23 FFO was about $96-100 million (after an ugly Q1) How does that compare to the year ago quarter (Q1/22). Even though Q1/23 had ugly product prices, it far exceeds Q1/22! FFO in Q1/22 was $78.6 million, or $0.97 per share. So despite ugly product prices in Q1/23, it looks like Q1/23 may have cash flow that is 23%+ higher  than the year ago quarter!  & ...more  
Comment by CarpeAurem on Apr 09, 2023 5:04am
JJB, Excellent analysis.  Thanks. The Feb corporate presentation has 265 for capex and 7% growth.  So Q1 capex might be 265 / 4. Growth makes it even better. I take 2023 FCF estimate and divide by EV and get about 13%.  There are a ot of Canadian small cap in that range.  I do about 25 - 30 of them.  So I ask about reserves, 1P is 309.  Ev is about 50% of reserves ...more  
Comment by JohnJBond on Apr 09, 2023 3:48pm
Q2 is break up, during which very little capex is spent.   ie capex is primarily spent during Q1, Q3 and Q4. So it is more accurate to divide annual capex by 3 to get a closer estimate of Q1 capex. As for the 265, If I remember correctly, they divided their capex into two categories - one traditional capex for production, and the other for exploration.     With the ...more  
Comment by thetruth54 on Apr 10, 2023 4:54pm
If Loukas has been buying shares the results are pretty pathetic. Just look at the volume the last two days around 260,000. If he is buying like 85,000 shares per day that would be about 32 % of the daily volume. The shares haven't gone anwhere. I wrote Investor Relations that this stock,which by the way I have owned for more than 16 years, is going to look like it is alive Loukas needs to put ...more  
Comment by JohnJBond on Apr 11, 2023 12:32pm
Hopefully when they do buy back shares, they will do so at the lowest possible price. The intent being to minimize the amount paid to reduce the number of shares outstanding. Given that the CEO, board and executives all have their bonuses linked directly to increases in the share price, it follows they are acting for their own best interest, and yours. I am disappointed that it appears they did ...more  
Comment by pennydredful on Apr 13, 2023 1:58pm
NCIB   can  only  buy  on  down tick  or  sidetick  .  It  CANNOT   pay   up  .
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities