Post by
TMAZZ21 on Feb 07, 2023 8:47pm
Shareholders rights
If there is negotiations happening with Pfizer than wouldn't we as shareholders have the right to know when an offer is presented!
In order to start any kind of negotiations would Pfizer start with an offer.
Then negotiations starts!
If I compare it to buying real estate even commercial real estate. Some one normally comes with an offer first to show interest and then negotiate from there.
From all these posts, it sounds like the normal is to start negotiations then come up with an offer.
The point I'm trying to make is, if there's an offer on the table and ONC are in negotiations based on an offer from Pfizer
then don't shareholders have a right to know!
Or does this 90 day code of silence protect the companies of disclosing of any offers and or negotiations!
We don't need to know exactly what the offer is or what the negotiations are about BUT we should have the right as shareholders to know if Onc was presented with an offer or if there's any negotiations regarding an offer negotiations.
Comment by
westcoast1000 on Feb 08, 2023 1:36am
The TMazz comment is completely wrong. The BOD is there to protect our interests and legally required to do so in terms of achieving the maximum possible value. NDAs are in place from the first possible discussion. That means: non-disclosure agreement. I am astounded someone would post that.
Comment by
canadafan on Feb 08, 2023 8:01am
Tamazz nice description document I think in a nut shell, exactly what between my reply & westcoast, exactly what we said. bottom line. shareholders will be well represented, by the in place rules. more importantly the NDA in my option is why things went so quiet after a month ago, bearding such great news ( then).