Oncolytics Biotech Inc T.ONC

Cancer will cost the world $25 trillion over next 30 years

[askretka]

07 March 2023  Nature.

https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-00634-9
------------------------------------------
This is a good place to have some money invested in my opinion with 2 X potential P3's only a few months away. 
Cheers!!!!!

[jimsenior]

I noticed a new urine test that may be able to predict bladder cancer 12 years before diagnosis. I mention this because ONC/ONCY was going to run a small trial in muscle-invasive bladder cancer, and there was quite a bit of buzz at the time. See release June 8, 2015. They withdrew the trial owing to repurposing. Nevertheless bladder cancer is yet another indication that an owner of pela could

[fox7mf]

Interesting. All BP currently involved in negotiations with Onc must be on cloud 9 thinking of all the revenue Pela could bring in. BP must be even more excited knowing that, in this current market, Oncy's once strong positioning at the negotiation table due to strong science is evaporating along with its SP. Make no mistake, SP matters. Hostile takeovers could happen. $10b buyouts won't

[jimsenior]

@fox. I am not sure anyone here has the answers to your valid questions.  Perhaps Sundaylady can offer something on this beautiful day. My only thought is that there are a few companies that have a great deal invested here in time and expertise, and with encouraging results so far, one assumes they are not going to let others pick it up for a song. Then again I am naive and do not really have

[Noteable]

Biopharma’s 25 largest companies have almost $1.5 Trillion in available “firepower”, EY estimates in its annual M&A Firepower report, a figure that has grown substantially since 2020. And Big Pharma faces a looming patent cliff. In the process of taking the Trillion dollar cost of cancer and Big Pharma's firepower into consideration, the PD-(L)1 immune checkpoint inhibitor market is

[westcoast1000]

Fox, One way would be for a big pharma to buy into oncy, say a 25% stake, for $ 1 billion or more. That would entail creating a new class of non-trading shares. Why would they do that? To get tied close to us. If that were the result of competitive bidding, it would not be a hard sell to a board. All IMHO

[Kswdelux]

I had posted this back in Dec, 2022, but will repost and add to it... I was concerned about this a few years back and queried MM at that time. His response was basically as follows... ( not his words... but my recap of...) In order for someone to attempt a hostile take over, they would have to buy up at least 10% of the float to even begin to push the issue. More likely 15-20% to be successful

[westcoast1000]

Thanks for this lucid and reassuring message, kswdelux.