Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Oncolytics Biotech Inc T.ONC

Alternate Symbol(s):  ONCY

Oncolytics Biotech Inc. is a clinical-stage biotechnology company. The Company is focused on developing pelareorep, an intravenously delivered immunotherapeutic agent that activates the innate and adaptive immune systems and weakens tumor defense mechanisms. This compound induces anti-cancer immune responses and promotes an inflamed tumor phenotype turning cold tumors hot through innate and... see more

TSX:ONC - Post Discussion

Oncolytics Biotech Inc > Happy new year, surprise is unfolding…
View:
Post by canadafan on Jan 01, 2024 1:17pm

Happy new year, surprise is unfolding…

I did comment a few weeks ago, there would be a surprise early 2024.
Again " surprise" by my definition is an unexpected event, outcome, action etc etc.
Could be good, bad or neutral. None the less.....unexpected.

Moving to now.
1. We know Andrew G, left Onc unannounced. Took his options & did not cash in.
2. As of my quick investigation, I can confirm the San Diego office is up for lease. Available Feb 1st.

Surprise!
It does not take much education to figure out, Onc is leaving its USA footprint.

Now some speculation & calculations. ( all imho based on as much information as I can gather)

Background.
The markets are closed & no " announcement" needs to be put forward YET.
Closing the USA business is a significant corporate business model change & imho should be discussed in a NR....Then again, back when I worked for Honeywell, they closed the whole Canadian marketing department, sold buildings & not a peep of a N.R.( cira 1989).So perhaps not requiring an explanation?

Moving the lens further back; Why did they open the SanDiego office & hire Andrew G....?

Was well explained at the time. Not as a N.R. Was part if quarterly update.
" they wanted a presence in the proximity to the biotech industry, with a USA title to be able to better relate to both potential partners & financial institutions aka availability of funds & biotech contacts"
They also at about that same time in tandem. Did a reverse split, listed in NAS & a relatively larger financing.
In simple terms. The plan was to get into the opportunity to be seen in the USA world & build forward into the then approved phase 2+ breast cancer.

Since then. Aware-1, bracelet, & Gobblet. Additional trials.Car- t etc 
aware-1 , did prove the desired " biomarker". 
Bracelet? Still in progress nothing bad so far, looking for results to mature. ( people have not died yet & results are therefore paradoxically delayed, but for a good reason).
Gobblet , with Roche... The best of the bunch.
Three out of 4 arms showing efficacy & results well above existing standard of care.
The goblet results alone, enough for Roche to take the reins.

Why close usa operations? Why no announcement?

Neutral explanation not an option. It is either good or bad.

Good news & next part of surprise ; 
A serious buyout negotiation is in progress. At the lawyer/ accountant phase. That is negotiations are done. Time to put to paper. Would explain the lack of news. During these times first line of contract is non- disclosure. Meaning they cannot  publicly say anything. Neither confirm or deney negotiations are underway.
To announce Andrew's departure & closing of office woukd require an explanation....obviously.
This is my prediction. To be announced very soon. Not a partership. Complete buyout from Roche.

Bad news?
Could be part of a protracted plan to reduce costs, move into phase 3 alone, with additional financing from the now near 10% ownership within Canada. Meaning that instution is driving the ship. " cut costs let's get into phase 3 & move forward from there"
That would be bad news in the short term. However if successful would be the best long term " shareholder value".

There are dozens of middle of the road scenarios. Taking company private, Partnership, delisting on NAS. Matt retiring. Whole new mangement. Etc etc.
Announcing " corporate review & outside consultants to sell the company"

What is not at this time an option or requirement, 
They do not need to do a reverse split. They have $$$ to operate 12 months ++. 
Closing the doors & walking away AKA.: Announcing dissolving the company.
Not in the same window as hiring a new " technical writer". Nor with 2 phase 3 ready cancer arms.
So save that noise. 

They will be moving forward into 2024. 

The next 1-3 weeks will be very exciting. Not the same old same old at all.
The PanCan cancellation was a surprise to Onc. It was profound.
THAT event triggered serious management & B.O.D. Discussions.
THAT could have excellerated any Roche or other take over discussions.
It did bring about a quick bought deal. 100% Canadian. First time that has happened in a long time.

for now we know the USA footprint is all but gone.

ending positive!
You do not need a USA office & VP , when company is being bought out.
The Calgary site. Nice R & D location;as part of the new arrangement.

BTW my target of buyout? $1.56 billion.$15- $18ps 
When the PanCan arrangement was announced , that was very positive news.
Without that ( they still have been granted the $5 million), changes must be made.
at this stage anything is possible 
Happy 2024 all.

Comment by venture009 on Jan 01, 2024 4:06pm
Canadafan, I lean more to them announcing they are going it alone, which I don't feel is beneficial to the shareholders. RS would be ineviable to raise cash and maintain their listing on the NASDQ. The reason I think this is, why commit to a conference in January if your status as a company has changed to be controlled by a BP? Also, if you're going it alone you no longer need a business ...more  
Comment by Noteable on Jan 01, 2024 4:29pm
venture009 your enmity for this company has been palpable for a very long time, so anything you say is tainted with that general hostility. So any buyout of ONCY over US$ 5 Billion will have your wrangled no matter what how quick it happens now.
Comment by Noteable on Jan 01, 2024 4:31pm
Should read: " ... over US$5 Billion will have you wrangled ...".
Comment by venture009 on Jan 01, 2024 4:59pm
Notable. why would the Business Development manager be let go when he would have been the guy initiating any bo or BP deal? Doesn't make sense. I want this company sold, period! My complaint with this company since 2010 is they do nothing to increase shareholder value and that is because Coffey has always looked at this as a personal project and his priority is to get it ti market even if it ...more  
Comment by Noteable on Jan 01, 2024 5:15pm
https://stockhouse.com/companies/bullboard/t.onc/oncolytics-biotech-inc?postid=35804304
Comment by Noteable on Jan 01, 2024 5:35pm
venture009 has only been around this message board since January 2023, so his specious implication that he has been in ONCY since 2010 is highly doubtful.   https://stockhouse.com/members/venture009
Comment by venture009 on Jan 01, 2024 5:57pm
Notable, you didn't answer my question.  Rather than worrying how long I have been on Stockhouse (your speculation is in correct) use some common sense regarding de G departure with no nr from ONC.
Comment by Noteable on Jan 01, 2024 6:14pm
How many more times do I need to post this link before certain controversial parties begin to understand that their want for embroilment does not require any further response? https://stockhouse.com/companies/bullboard/t.onc/oncolytics-biotech-inc?postid=35804304
Comment by 13X2413 on Jan 01, 2024 6:30pm
You don't think a person holding an important position leaving the company and the shutting of the US office is  insignificant? How about letting investors know about these developments? Notwithstanding your belief he didn't do anything, you have to admit it's a little unnerving. 
Comment by Noteable on Jan 01, 2024 6:44pm
Yes, insignificant, particularly if ONCY is preparing to be acquired.
Comment by Journeytc on Jan 01, 2024 6:32pm
I started writing something negative about ONC and refrain. Instead I'll babble. Downsizing is positive for the current business model.  I assume he left.  It would be extremely difficult/frustrating to  work there with such slow progress.      Silence on breast cancer trial is awesome.   It means those nasty patients are surviving.  The primary ...more  
Comment by Buckhenry on Jan 01, 2024 6:50pm
It's comical and sad at the same time that the forever pumpers get so bent out of shape on a public site that has absolutely no bearing on what the company does they remind me of the woke movement that is ready to riot if you don't support their narrative.  I expect 2024 to be no different as far as their rethoric on here. 
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities